Sarcasm? Wasn't my "detective skills", but if pretty much any other paediatrician group comes to a different conclusion you have to wonder. Especially if the main argument they seem to make for circumcision is a supposed "money saving" argument for later in life.

Riiiight.

*sniff*, I am being snipped. How will I go on?

Um, no:

"A "religio-cultural bias?" seeing how as more than 60% of American males are circumcised, that "bias" seems pretty mainstream."

Only if you get breast implants. No guy wants to see flat chested women.

There are several different "severities" when it comes to female circumcision and US law (and others probably too) completely say no to anything around the female genitalia, even the "ritual nicks" that some want to perform are a big no-no (from what I read they leave a small scar at the most).

From an article that looked at the report:

As someone who isn't circumcised I can tell you that there is a lot of sensitivity in the foreskin as well as the head. Anyone who isn't and ever had a hardon in their underwear can attest to just how uncomfortable that is. I have a hard time believing that someone who is circumcised would not lose the sensitivity in…

Take a look who actually produced this document for the AAP. Can you say "conflict of interest"?

Well, for one the Fuji's utilize a larger sensor, hence the design of the lens needs to be a bit more complex, this also results in a higher cost, not to mention things like the viewfinder are adding to the cost.

The prices for the lenses isn't that premium compared to what others charge.

Actually not quite. Lost of States had very strict laws / regulations. It was only after the SCOTUS ruling that these laws started to get dismantled.

Actually if you look at the history of the 2nd amendment and it's interpretation the current one dates back to a SCOTUS ruling from the 1970s. Before then the general interpretation was that militias really meant State organized military groups, not every single individual.

The problem aren't guns, it's how culture sees guns. Lot's of countries have a high gun ownership without the constant killing spree. So clearly, it's not the guns but the culture that surrounds guns that is the problem.

I guess my disappointment was that they had to have aliens at all. *shrug*, but then again, I don't think you could create a 2001 today and it being a success.

My take on people sitting at tables that are intended for groups is just to grab a seat if it's clear they're all by their own. Sharing is caring and all that.

Oh yeah, I had forgotten about that, mostly because the rest was pretty much forgettable.

No I am not missing the point. But the reality is that any technology that would try to counter sudden acceleration / deceleration would try to apply the same counter force. If it wouldn't you would see them always "sway" back and forth as the ship moves normally (presuming that normal physics apply to the ship and…

As pretty as it looks, I think I wait until someone puts a playthrough onto YouTube. I just don't have the "nerves" anymore to play JRPGs. Old age I guess.