Yeah, no. As I said before, Bull Shit.

I liked how he was a “soft” villain though, in that he never got too cruel or deceitful, but seemed to genuinely want to bask in Sigrid’s light (and use it to bolster his own of course) until he came to realize the folly of it. I agree, they could have done more with the character but I still adored him.

“Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.” Also Maya Angelou, implying that people can change and become better.

I kind of hope he wins and Twitter is forced, by a court of law to reveal the identity of it’s users here. Maybe the first step towards the end of social media anonymity.  Wouldn’t that be a good thing, overall? 

He seemed decidedly not guilty before, and filing a lawsuit for something that clearly sounds like defamation doesn’t somehow make him seem guilty now.

I know a bunch of conservatives are flap-jacking their gums about this.  Better butter them up with some good press, or the press will get griddled.

I just hope they don’t waffle on this decision.

It’s about damn time! Perhaps soon I can change my name 😂😂

[Puts away joke about Cruz finding his conscience about as often as...]

Why would Jim Jordan want to wrestle Ron Pearlman anyway? Pearlman hasn't been a 17 year old boy for a long time...

In fairness, nobody’s better at turning left than Nascar.

You left out a key element of this. The official report first stated that the man “tripped and fell”... that Is, until the video emerged.

Man, the Six Flags guy is really in a bad place. And by that I mean Poland.

Hannibal Lecter, Walter White, and Don Draper are fictional characters, whereas Betty Broderick is a real person who really killed two people.  This is an extremely poor comparison (and Don Draper wasn’t even a fictional murderer, so it’s a doubly bad comparison).

“the focus here is on the woman as wronged victim”

But..But...She’s a woman! She can’t possibly be held responsible for her own actions!

I understand where this comes from, but in the end... no. Just no. Not another “oh, the murderer was PUSHED TO DO IT BECAUSE...” portrait. I honestly hate the “imagine if the sexes were reversed” thing because often it comes from a disingenuous place, but I think it’s apt here. If I’m reading the review right, Dan’s…

I haven’t seen this and I’m not going to, so take my opinion for it’s worth (not much), but: murdering your children’s father and a presumably innocent other person is, like, maybe not so relatable? Or defensible? This woman had many, many other options, including leaving her husband years ago.