thecapn
The Cranberry Cap'n
thecapn

Those shoes look like amputee prosthetics. Yikes.

When I first heard about it, I was like "nopenopenopenope, no thanks, nope". Can't bring myself to even try.

Iron Man's chest piece?

Me too, it's making my stomach turn.

I feel like if for some reason I was called up to roast someone, I would handle it like Andy Sandberg and do a funny pretend #roastfail because I just can't bring myself to be mean.

Right? I also noticed that on the close ups of her face she doesn't appear to be wearing makeup (besides stage makeup, of course). No dumb suspension of disbelief so that our female lead can be shown in eyeliner in space all the time.

Of course. How could he not save the day? He's the perfect man.

Lol, the thought of 13 year olds with "game" makes my younger self cringe. I mean, I know it's "game" with other 13-year-olds, but still. Harrrrr

To be fair, this is the computer they were creating Toy Story on:

I really think Jane Lynch is beautiful when she isn't playing frumpified Sue Sylvester.

Victoria's Secret boy shorts are the worst offenders. I feel like they purposefully make them horribly uncomfortable and ride up your crotch. Personally, instead of boy shorts, men's boxer briefs from Hanes are very comfortable. Full coverage, no riding up, no underwear lines across your ass, perfect.

I'm not really phased either, but I do get grossed out when I have to sit in the seat on the bus that someone wearing those shorts just sat in. Ass all over my seat :-(
But yes, these shorts do seem to... Split... Certain areas. It's a torture device.

There is a pretty good book about food addiction and recovery called Fat Boy, Thin Man. I recommend for an intimate inside look at food addition, for those of us who aren't familiar with it personally.

Oh, I agree. I don't think it should have been banned and it seems to me that Facebook didn't really examine the case that closely before making a decision. However, I do think that the double entendre, if it was intended, is a bit creepy since it would reference juvenile/underage boobs.

Maybe not have them on the marketing campaign?

Actually, I do, but that's besides the point. I don't think anyone was suggesting that the official term be changed. The purpose was to attract tourists, presumably who aren't all scientists, so common sense would say that perhaps they should think a little harder about their copy. If it was a joke, it didn't work. If

Just googled him for his earlier career. Holy mother of image-makeover, Batman.

I never said it was right, I said it could sound creepy. You may not think so, but evidently a lot of other people did, enough to report it to Facebook. Not everyone is a bird watcher, so I have to assume that most people would usually associate juvenile with young humans and not birds. Again, even if it was not

COOL PEOPLE DON'T WEAR TUXEDOS

Right, which is a turn of phrase and does not literally mean that you must admit. We've been over this part before. Anyway, you think it's a bad turn of phrase, I think it's unwise copy that can sound creepy, and probably the real reason that the picture was taken down. Not because they said "boobies" alone.