Thanks to a panel-wide misunderstanding of Asian geography and some nimble betting work, he won.

He probably isn’t going to remember some offhanded comment he made upon meeting a new person. If it made her deeply uncomfortable, she’s probably going to remember it. Pretty simple.

Well, no country is perfect, but at least Ireland can have an abortion debate.

He’s not in trial for that crime though. Evidence of prior bad acts to show propensity is really dangerous. Just cause you did a bad thing before doesn’t mean you did a bad thing this time.

You’re right. That information would probably be inadmissible in the Mississippi trial. Usually evidence of another crime can’t be used unless it relates to the way the crime is committed (modus operandi) or some other way that related to the crime on trial. It may possibly be admissible if, for example, in the…