thePrototype
thePrototype
thePrototype

I haven't disregarded the meals that are offered in schools. If you read my previous postings, you would see that I think that schools should allow children to bring their own meals (the idea that they aren't allowed is awful), and then who cares what they serve at the schools as it's the parent's decision to either

If a child has a medical issue, he should be treated exactly the same way a dyslexic child and reading issues. He should get a doctor's note and grading would be adjusted accordingly.

If you're up for it, try an open relationship. Once both my husband and I realized we couldn't be monogamous it made our LDR so much better, and it was so hot when we did get to see eachother knowing that we had been with other people in the mean time.

If it is the parents' fault, then they should by all means get a report, maybe in addition to that report, they should get a report of how school prepared food they eat?

School has always had physical education and it shouldn't be focused solely on pumping out kids for college. Being able to complete basic physical activities should be a requirement to continue on, running a mile really isn't any more challenging for an inactive child than having to read Shakespeare is for a child

Absolutely, why not? There are lots of kids that have problems with math/reading/science that can run a mile no problem. It's very good for you that you get paid to think, so do I, but I don't get paid to balance chemical equations or dissect animals. In fact the field that I work in has absolutely nothing to do with

re: breakfast, if they ate breakfast at home they shouldn't be eating it at school.

I'm reading a lot of people on here blaming the school cafeteria for their children's weight problems.

I agree 100% with you, and I have lots of family in the education field and their opinions are in line with yours.

The difference is, one is by choice, the other is forced temporarily by circumstance. Those are two completely different situations with a similar outcome.

There's a difference between being a stay at home parent and being a dual income household where one happens to be temporarily unemployed. If one decides to transition from being unemployed to being a stay at home parent that is their choice.

Your situation is clear, but you must understand that the resulting child was the product of a number of choices. It's not like a stork just dropped a baby off at your doorstep, that is my point.

It does, but you chose to have children knowing that would be the case, didn't you?

They are sweaty, but there is a lot of coastline... and have you seen their swimsuits?

How does that happen?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but she and John McCain were defeated, right?

And that is why you would co-apply for a credit card. I can't think of a single logical reason why one would need to have their own individual card.

I can't overstate the psychological effect of relying completely on a spouse for such an essential part of adult finances.

There was a funny statistic about Major League baseball and how few African-Americans there are playing in it. Some people got really upset until it was pointed out to them that a large amount of black players were indeed from Central/South America and were not 'African-American'.

They really don't make any sense, I know my future children will not be Canadian-American.