Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

It’s an alert, not a mechanism. Maybe he doesn’t want to shut off his rig if it’s just below the line and he assumes it will go back up. The point of alerts is to alert you of things, not to do the things for you. I’m sure if he wanted to be taken out of the loop, he would have done that, instead.

I get what you are saying though

Yes, but what you seem to be failing to understand is that your issues are issues with the product, not my tangential product that relies on the facility of the product.

“Wanting it” and “Regulating it” are two wildly different things. And when you say “He’s not wrong”, you’re not articulating the former.

This is...irrelevant? Either the wallpaper only works when it’s on fire, in which case it’s only as good as that, or it works when it’s close enough to a fire that it can be useful, in which case, so would the non-wallpaper version.

No, the difficult thing to grasp is how you honestly still don’t get it.

Focusing on this being ‘wallpaper’ is missing the point. A flat-surface smoke detector is good enough for me. If I can ditch the goofy little disc that hangs on the wall for a piece of custom-printed art that serve the same purpose, I’d be happy with that.

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

Whoops! Looks like my comment got dismissed. No worries, I’ll repost the highlights (and continue to repost it, as many times as it gets dismissed).

No no, that was only an example. Just for demoing how the tech works. The idea is that you wouldn’t be able to log into you Google account with a username and password, as it would be authenticated via your ‘key’ as well.