Maybe you should have read the rest of that thread? Because the obvious counter-argument to that is that there’s nothing to say that the car WASN’T “better than a human.”

Gotta love a commenter who cites actual legal doctrine rather than perpetuating this insipid “Yuh huh!”/”Nu-uh!”

How is what I said incorrect?

This mostly applies to software development, too.

Always star for Clone High.

Accepting the inevitability of selfishness is, literally, step one. And, yes, it’s frustrating that some people can’t even do that.

But this isn’t really how image compression works. Most image compression is done by binary compression algorithms, which work on any file type, so they don’t deal with pixel manipulation.

Yeah, dude, that’s why Toyota won against the people who brought a lawsuit against them for their malfunctioning accelerators.

Don’t mind the peanut gallery; you’ve got a solid take. This kind of thing has a long history of legal responsibility, and you’re not wrong to point out the lack of responsibility in using a branded image improperly.

Jesus christ, dude. I know you know better than this. I expect this kind of hand-wringing-for-it’s-own-sake from the general commentariat, but are you really scolding this commenter for stating a really simple (if tangential) fact?

As far as I’m aware, the secure enclave is just the place where the one-way encryption occurs. So you send it a password, it encrypts that password and checks it against the stored, encrypted password, and then it sends back a response that includes whether the attempt was successful and the next time when an attempt…

You’re fighting the good fight, friend. Kids around here think that if racism stopped existing tomorrow, they’d all be living in utopia.
And while, yes, it would be a hell of a lot better than it is now, it wouldn’t stop any of the problems that don’t stem from racism. Ditto for sexism.

“That it is possible” is a non-argument.

Not enough info here to be certain, but my assumption has been that they can create a full emulated copy of the phone, digitally, and then brute force the digital emulation, which can be reset to its original state after each attempt.

What moderates are good for: Representing moderate electorates.

No, a California restaurant tried a publicity stunt. It succeeded as a publicity stunt, and failed in functionality.

I’m mostly with you, but you seem to be making the claim that we will never be able to produce a simultaneous, predictive 4D process that can coincide with a person’s existence, and then at a predetermined “snapshot” of that person, begin executing the arbitrary tasks that the person would.

Solid thread. Unfortunately, this is a “personal responsibility” problem, and the US (and, I believe humanity, as a whole) has always had a huge issue with “personal responsibility”.

Evans. (the cousin of Devin)