Well this is pretty interesting. I never called you stupid. Only your arguments. They were poor arguments and I accurately appraised them, with support for that appraisal.

Aww! Look at you try to be smart! Hey, buddy, you’ll get there some day! Here, let’s try to help:

You could! But it wouldn’t be factual, and it would make you seem stupid.

Now see? That’s not so hard, is it?!

It is when you don’t provide any context for it. “Red” is a perfectly serviceable descriptor, but it can mean a variety of different colors, when it has no context. So, again:

Hey! It’s learning! Good job, fellow human!

My own definitions? I asked questions. You didn’t answer. The fact that I could ask those questions is a refutation of your point, because your point has been that your statement is a fact. When it, by every criteria of a fact, simply cannot be. You have been refuted. That you refuse to admit it is entirely…

Really? How do you figure? What is “easier”? You mean physically easier? I doubt that. You mean cognitively easier? I doubt that, as well. I think like this, all the time. It’s pretty second nature to me, now. Typing what I think is a very simple thing, for me. I learned to type at a young age and have kept in great…

That’s an unverifiable statement.

This is my favorite thread because you said a completely unverifiable statement (“Being fat is unhealthy”), and then everyone told you how fucking stupid you were until you went away.

It’s only as dumb as the application. The way in which I use it is incisive and useful. Using it for “Movies” is dumb, because that’s a dumb application of it.

My rule of thumb is: If it’s anime, it’s not a good show.

The “Ready Player One”-type scenario is called “Alternate Reality”. Which is still shitty, because the initialism “AR” is used for both “Alternate Reality” and “Augmented Reality”, and those two couldn’t be further from each other.

I’m wasting time writing “lengthy essays” because I honestly believe that you can understand what I’m talking about if you just try. And I honestly believe that you, as a good person, would try to understand.
I may be wrong about everything in those sentences. But I’m happy to err on the side of positivity, rather than…

My point, which you seem to be almost purposefully missing, is that your argument was a stupid one, and you should have just said what you meant, from the beginning.

Why do I need an example of that? Give me an example of a man who wasn’t criticized after saying, word-for-word, “sexual assault is bad”.

You asked a question. When you got that question answered, you responded with this:

Do you honestly think people don’t see you moving those goalposts? What the fuck answer do you want?

Cable management is for cretins. If the case closes, you’re in good shape. If it doesn’t, just hang the components on wires and experience a truly free and easy-to-tinker-with machine!

Woah, easy there - you’re coming awfully close to making an actual point, which would require nuanced thought and an acknowledgement of the intrinsic values of both systems, as well as the foundational issues with both systems. Then you would have to reconcile with the obvious and simple fact that both systems must be…