Utter junk, it was developed with the Jaguar Stype and followed the Jaguar reputation of being junk. The are good looking and it all sounds nice on the outside but just check that "quality" index score of 9... And thats not out of 10.

So they are taking after Acura now?

Loved hotwheels as a kid and was looking for a 70s chevelles on ebay at the age of 12. I kind of lost it durring middle school and wasnt until i bought my 98 Camaro i really started learning and following the car culture and have had 5 cars since. I am lucky enough right now to have 3 of my dream cars. Yes they are…

Pianalto praised “cash for clunkers” at a September meeting. “This increased production in autos and industries related to autos was critical to the stabilization in” output.

Look, I'd like to live in a world where I could buy new GTOs, Firebirds, and G8s as much as the next guy, and I know that rumors are apparently spreading about Pontiac's return, but it isn't happening.

If you like have flashing blue and red lights behind you then yeah

Had a 94 Bravada and i loved it. Granted i bought it for $750 with 220K on it but was a work horse. It was 3 different people's first car (not me) by the time i sold it. I personally love the 80s box look and they are sort of easy to work on. unless its electrical or heat related.

wait are you talking K5 Blazer? If…

Rollover protection in modern cars is much greater than it's ever been, and while that's a good thing no doubt, it totally ruins visibility.

No more! The rapid improvement in design, technology, and performance has people trading in cars faster than ever, with Edmunds reporting that the average lease is now 36 months or less, which is about how people treat smartphones.

A good set of tires. It might not be a hack but it can be stress enough that the difference is dramatic

190E 5spd. Even stig had a problem with it.

Maybe I'm crazy, but that doesn't seem to make sense. Amber rear turn signals should be required.

The viper and the V8 charger and challenger as SRT....

See thats one thing i was worried about. It drives like a car and not a truck. Like what your saying with the downshifting, I would want it to as fast as possible. When your actually using a truck its nice to have that quick downshift if you pulling something ether up hill or get to highway speeds.

oops yeah meant 3.6l. And ok i was just curious how GMs universal car motor is doing in a truck. I would have rather seen the new 4.3l (new as in the Direct fuel injection not the fact its 1970s sb missing 2 cyl) but i understand why they didnt.

My question would be is how is the pickup in the pickup? meaning torque and acceleration. its a relatively bigger truck, almost as big as my 96 k1500. The 3.2l v6 is a hp over torque motor (305hp to 269tq) so i am curious to see if it has the get up needed when towing.

I would take any 4x4 Tahoe or Suburban over 90% of station wagons. There are only two i can think of that i would take, a CTS-V wagon and any manual Volvo R wagon.

Love Cragar SS. I never did understand why they didnt continue the Ramcharger. (Mexico had them but they botched that up) I mean you had the Bronco and the K5 Blazer (which lasted the longest though it was call the Yukon GT). Though after Fords and GMs restyle both were killed.

True was thinking options not style, but the big GM interior overhaul was 95. And the Vortec in 96 was a big bump in power, even though it still was the 305 and 350 from forever ago. (Still not sure why it took so long for the Vortec to hit the SBs, it was on the 4.3L since 92)

Damn i did miss it. I wasnt thinking it that way, was thinking available options not style. But i did know the previous ram like the 93 below looked like it was designed in the 70s and sold like it too.