This piece references Trump not once but twice, but *doesn’t* mention current-president-and-STILL-the-actual-most-powerful-person-in-the-world Obama? Gee, I wonder who has had more power over the time of the Syrian crisis....

BULLSHIT!! Obama has been doing daily briefings about world security. This can’t possilby have happened.

because I was a little surprised that there were laws against carrying knives

Circa 2015, firecracker is illegal within the entirety of New York State.

The next President is Lisa Simpson. It has been foretold.

But Obama is a (D), so it’s OK. Trump though? He stole the election from Hillary, and has orange skin that can be constantly made fun of. He’s obviously the guilty one here.

I don’t know whether you’re kidding or not, but kuss ummak.

Hahahahaha! Blaming everything on the Russians now. We are back in the eighties. Hahahahahahaha!

but they do.

One of the truly heartening things to me was that 90% of my conservative family and friends either didn’t vote for president or voted for Gary Johnson (and live primarily in Virginia and Ohio). And each one said the same thing: they couldn’t in good conscience vote for Donald Trump.

This is amazing because I just subscribed to SA this weekend. I was so impressed with their article on exercise and depression. I have an MA in English so any time an essay is not just contextual and well-logic’ed but also impeccably organized and easy to follow I basically am required by law to throw my money at it.

Abbot ain’t no libertarian.

Nah.

Is it though? It seems pretty obnoxious and egotistical, if you ask me.

The entire premise of this article suggests that women’s magazines have dealt with stupid and demeaning topics because of male dominance at those magazines.

it’s all part of the collective male media hegemony that puts women’s magazines, no matter how serious, in the pink ghetto, as it were.

What gets me about these people mentioning war crimes is that they probably didn’t follow this story close enough to know that no war crimes or evidence of were uncovered.

I don’t think a 35 year prison sentence for espionage (and other crimes) is outlandishly harsh. If anything, it is a lift sentence.

Plus there were no ‘war crimes’ exposed. There is video of civilians being killed, but they were targeted because they were misidentified as combatants, not because they were civilians. You can clearly hear in the audio they thought he had an rpg, but it turned out later to be a telephoto camera lens.

Commute her sentence so she can peace out to Russia and be neighbors with Snowden? Hard pass.