That’s what my mother always said about me.

It’s going to sound silly, but I got so happy when I realized this wasn’t ‘video content.’

That w as the only scene in the movie I liked.

that is the main heading of my eharmony profile.

Yes I fully endorse “an extremely petty breakdown of...” becoming a weekly feature.

Has the fanchise just forgotten that the dinosaurs on Isla Nubar aren’t really dinosaurs but just genetic abominations that approximate what Ingen thought dinosaurs looked like in the 90's?

I agree in concept, but it absolutely depends on the world design of the game. The main problem with minimaps, as I see it, is not so much the visual distraction as it is the fact that the assumption of their presence and use changes the way developers design their game worlds. The problem with playing Assassin’s…

I’d say there’s something wrong with you if you have problems focusing on the center of the screen when there’s a mini-map. You should only be looking at the mini-map if you’re going somewhere. It’s very strange to be distracted by it in the middle of a game when something is going on.

I’m #teamcompass every single time, but the best option would be giving the player an option to choose between a mini-map or compass.

Yes, I hate compass systems and I love mini-maps. I don’t spend the whole game looking at them. I just glance over every now and then if I’m a bit lost. So much better than opening a whole map.

Removing them entirely is a horrible idea.

It’s strange, because I do think that Toyota and Honda are just so much more risk averse. I don’t know the explanation, but considering Mazda is so much smaller, maybe the leadership feels it’s justified to try to break out of design stagnation. I applaud them. I have to say, I’ve seen a few Mazda 6's around and…

There has to be a design school in Japan where the A and B students are hired at Mazda and then the C and D students go to Honda or Toyota... it has to be the only explanation for how one company can do it so right and the others can’t even find the middle-ground.

I had no idea CR issued ratings on cars they’ve never tested/driven before. Honestly, that sounds like an exceedingly stupid thing to do. I’ve used CR in the past to give me an overall guide of what cars to AVOID, but it’s certainly not the final determiner of what car I buy... I’ll likely continue this practice- but…

It seems kind of wrong to be giving a reliability score without any sort of testing, and labeling it as such. It should probably be a ‘predicted reliability’ rating instead.

1. Run flats run for a rather limited range. 50 miles or so. So you pretty much have to drop what you’re doing and head over to get that fixed. Which can be difficult as flats can happen after hours, or on weekends.

Cars should have spare tires. Period.

This is no surprise, is it? I would be shocked, shocked I tell you, if you said more than 25% of people driving around knew how to change a tire.

Yeah, I was in line this morning (didn’t get one) but 3 FREAKING PEOPLE in line in front of me were bragging about how this would be their second or third one purchased. Fuck those people.