The only thing I learned is how crazy a lot of ladies still are for Johnny Depp. Like, I knew he was still a popular actor but I thought over the years a lot of his appeal had moved from sex appeal to... I don’t know, acting skill or something. But man seeing some reactions (that I know for a fact weren’t just bots),…

Intimacy coaches for entertainment industry was a huge win. 

The lifeblood of internet commentary is angry arguments. Cosby and Weinstein didn’t generate the same level of vitriol, I think, because condemning them didn’t generate a lot of engagement. It’s not like a bunch of people suddenly feel compelled to respond if you tell them Bill Cosby sucks.

I think that’s right. Or, maybe, that the public has only gone so far when it comes to #MeToo. It was easy-ish to get people on board with hating Harvey Weinstein — he’s a bloated, grotesque studio executive who preyed on women in obvious ways. But it doesn’t necessarily follow that people aghast at Weinstein’s…

5. Propaganda works.

1. People are desperate to find a case to undo the gains of MeToo and will amplify any edge case they can.

I read an article about Glassdoor ratings that noted that the ratings for SpaceX consisted of a constant trickle of negative ratings with one or two massive pulses of positive ratings over a week, once or twice a year. Apparently periodically he’ll command everyone to post a positive rating.

They will quickly find that you have to have a senior staff to train the new people.

Word is getting around about working conditions at his companies. In the aerospace field, it’s been known that he burns out engineers and then tosses them aside. Some of those engineers leaving the field altogether. They leave engineering (not just the aerospace field). My daughter was asked to apply for a summer…

Good luck keeping those tech workers Elon, market is hot for workers right now.

This is a superficial understanding of inclusion and a well known strawman. No one said “ideas we don’t agree with are exclusionary”. Exclusionary are exclusionary regardless of whether or not someone agrees with them.

Assuming you’re referring to COD, it’s certainly jingoistic. Fascist is an impressive stretch, though. Both are problematic, but they’re not synonymous. 

Hey, I’m not saying this is a good implementation. I’m saying this was clearly inevitable.

Limiting an account to a physical location is only a problem if you think Netflix gives a shit about screwing over customers. Seeing as how we’re even talking about an anti-sharing crackdown in the first place, it seems pretty obvious just how much Netflix cares.

Paradox of tolerance. Extending tolerance to those with intolerant views results in that tolerance getting destroyed by the intolerant.

I do not look forward to the fucking cesspool that is going to be the grey's, not to mention the Twitter replies. 

Oo, bad news. Your argument according to some lawyers is actually why TCGs could reasonably be challenged as gambling, it just hasn’t happened. In fact, even baseball cards could be called out on this:

I stand by loot boxes need better regulations across the board. same with trading cards and other “surprise” products.

Famous Asshole: “Hey, look at this funny thing I found, 95 million followers.”

I’m waiting for the PS5 Guys, which is the inside of a Five Guys.