“Not that inviting now is it?”

As a gay man, I’d like to say that I in no way care. This game looks boring and stupid. When I play games I want to render my opponent to bits using a rocket launcher, make enemies dissipate into a fine blue mist with a sword, and kill school girls to make Sempai notice me.

whats so bad about it?

Lol, 98% of the sales are going to be spite/gag gift purchases.

why only women? why not gay men? As long there is a market it should exist.

This is incorrect. The unsealed depositions show that Bubba told the FBI that Hogan knew he (Bubba) had cameras in his house. Bubba testified that Hogan did not know he was being filmed. So did a heather Clem who is depicted having sex and is not a celebrity. You can infer (as Gawker wants to) that Hogan knew but the…

it’s still fucking private. jesus how does gawker at once denounce the fappening as sexual harassment but posting someone’s sex tape and refusing to take it down under the flag of journalistic integrity ok?

It’s on Jalopnik too, for some reason that totally has nothing to do with the pathetic smear campaign Denton’s running against any and everything Thiel.

You mean like Gawker always has?

No it doesn’t. Both Hogan and Heather Clem testified they did not know they were being filmed. Bubba said to the Feds “Hogan knew I had cameras in my house” which is not the same thing. I'm not sure the exist ace of the tape is newsworthy but showing it wasn't.

Gawker is now a vengeful tabloid.

Snark is one thing, but honestly, this is the n-th article I read about Thiel and any of his associates (esp. a very-very ugly piece about Palantir) recently. I understand this vendetta, but honestly, Gawker was clearly in the wrong in the first place (not because they published, but because they are inconsistent and…

Don’t forget when a closeted guy was being blackmailed by a gay prostitute and gawker sided with the blackmailer and outed him. They let the blackmailer use them to carry out the extortion threats and then acted like it was a real news story

The piece isn’t, but it’s an excuse to plaster “Wow Mark Zukerberg is paranoid as fuck” across all their blogs. I found this off the deadspin page haha.

Ah, yes, the “Let’s paint the picture of someone associated with Peter Thiel as someone who’s a paranoid psycho for doing something that is 100% normal and often even required by employers in secure computing industries” hyperbole.

Gotcha. My bad.

Um, the title of the piece, for starters. This is an extremely common thing for anyone in the technology industry to do, and Giz is making it out like he’s some super-paranoid psycho, simply because he didn’t remove Thiel from his board yesterday.

Don't forget who the bad guy is: the guy who helped a washed up wrestler get millions because Gawker invaded his privacy but publishing a sex tape that was filmed without his knowledge but refused to publish pictures of famous Hollywood actresses/models whose pictures were leaked.

“How dare you not remove a board-member whom we disapprove of because he funded a lawsuit against us after we ousted him for being gay directly against his wishes because we don’t feel like he deserves the right to keep such information from the wealthy middle-eastern people he works with?!

They like to make enemies I guess. I don’t think they ever fully recovered from the iPhone 4 incident, atleast that’s how I feel on the whole thing.

When Zuck decided to keep Thiel on the board