tgdr
tgdr
tgdr

No matter which way you look at it, the R8, despite being a cool car, is nearing 10 years old, making it one of the oldest supercars currently on the market. You can keep putting new faces on it and updating the engine, but it’s still the R8. The Gallardo has been replaced already, for crying out loud. Fresh R8

Having twice been divorced myself, keep the Mini. At least for a while. Your life is currently upside down, don’t risk getting a car loan that could make your finances upside down too. That is, unless the Mini is already upside down, in which case, ditch it and forget the $20-$25k budget. Go used, go cheap, save your

Nailed it.

All of your criteria are wrong. You’re a recent divorcee, aren’t you automatically issued a motorbike?

THE single most perfect car for the Bros Before Hoes crowd of recent divorcees

+1. Making things “affordable” is what is making them expensive.

People want to be debt serfs. They bid everything up to the limit to which they can borrow. They demand new regulations that increase the cost basis because isn’t it worth a extra $10 a month to be “safer”? Also we live in a short time preference society. People want stuff now, not later.

The 0.01% learned how to

Can we stop using the price of an individual share of a company’s stock as a reference for anything? It’s completely meaningless, and using it as a metric for comparison shows a tremendous amount of ignorance and makes any other point you try to establish extremely questionable.

Could you imagine picking up an educated (shallow) woman for a first date in this thing?

Haven’t nearly all cars done well in this test (35mph full width impact) for several decades? IIHS testing is much more difficult with only 25% of the vehicle impacting the barrier - really, who crashes into a smooth wall at a perfect right angle? - at a higher speed to boot.

Not for Mazda and its former PR rep extraordinaire, Bev:

Even if that would work and pass regulations, it’s simply idiotic.

Wow, they put the F1 engine in a Civic!

You certainly could have a great debate regarding the pros and cons of tax incentives to buy an EV car, but to make EV car buyer pay a tax for gas they aren’t using? That’s a bunch of BS.

It sounds like it has a squeaky belt from the front and it idles like a diesel from the back. It sounds broken.

Spoiler alert for those who can’t watch video at work.

I worked at Scottsdale Ferrari when the F50 came out. Ferrari stipulated that they could only be sold to people who currently owned a Ferrari.

Now playing

How did cracking a walnut become such a standard way to measure strength?

So I do have one gripe:

Going to be completely pedantic here. Audi doesn’t capitalize the “q” in quattro. So yeah, I’m that guy. My bad. Flame away.