When it's standard operating procedure, there's no need to interview anyone except doctrine.

And I wasn't asking for anyone to be, either.

Agreed. One guy responded that he wants to trade pictures of each other and "find out who the real man is".

A body check isn't it, though I fully agree the male to her left should have been the lead target.

I didn't realize I was in the presence of greatness?

Correct.

Hardly. I wrote Ron Paul in the last presidential election and consider the Department of Homeland Security to be one of our biggest threats.

We have no idea that hadn't already happened. (We do know the crowd was repeatedly told to disperse.)

Totally agree he should have been the lead target.

I would assume so? I don't know?

"I don't thank you for your service because people like you represent our country in the worst possible way."

24, but wow. Nailed that one! (I'm not being sarcastic, either. Good guess on the age then, though I am a few years older now.)

Not the greatest, that's for sure. Anywhere from 50-65, with a PT score over a 5 1/2 year stint that would fall somewhere between 240 and 285 depending on whether I could take my fat ass to the AAFES Burger King.

I've addressed this multiple times: I agree with you and the male should have been the "lead target". (I was criticized earlier for using that description, as this is not 'Nam I was told.)

"And she was so obviously a threat he could not have just warned her back?"

And don't interpret that to mean I am saying, "AH! I got blown up! I'm all fucked up!"

Since we were running a PSD and only encountered one CWIED over a year-long deployment...

"So, why didn't the cop attack the several people that walked into the EXACT same bullshit buffer zone you're blathering on about?"

The fact you made a name this quickly in order to respond to me is what's comical.

You can read, correct?