I’m a man. I wear tights at the gym, because I get cold if when I sweat in a not-very-warm gym. This happens year-round because most gyms I’ve gone to, in the winter they only run the heat just high enough for people not to complain about the cold, but in the summer the AC is cold enough and people have fans blowing…

EVs are becoming increasingly common at least in major metro areas. I’m in the DC area and there are plenty of Teslas, with a smattering of other stuff like Chevy Bolts, Kia Soul EVs and Audi e-Trons.

But are you talking NA or TT? I know the TT is difficult but the 2+2 is NA only...

Hey, they didn’t specify rear-facing...BUT!

Porsche 911s handle kiddie seats fine, I don’t see why this would be different.

Legless Canadians, small children, close enough, right?

No offense to the Prelude, Integra and RSX but what about the Z32 300ZX 2+2?!

How bout this?

My local Hyundai dealer is advertising their Veloster Ns with a $495 discount, plus a few not-everyone-qualifies incentives like military, loyalty & college grad.

If all you meant to say was “these vegan processed food companies are profitable because lots of people are buying their products,” then why ascribe it to “vegans as a whole?” Your choice of words could just as easily be read as the majority of vegans eat the stuff often. And if you were concerned about clearing that…

How do you know that "vegans as a whole" are "eating this stuff by the truckload"?

Ok fine we have to go pedantic? Yes, they said “I think,” that “many” vegans went vegan for superficial-to-them reasons, and then continued on to state that the reason they think this is based on their experience with one specific vegan. Which is generalizing about a whole group based on experience with one member.…

I’ve assumed nothing. You said:

This has nothing to do with a science-speak or a lab environment or the real world. For a conclusion to be true, it must be based on facts.

That’s not how this works. You made a conclusion that’s not supported by your premises. You need more information to support your conclusion. You’ve done everything except provide more information to support your conclusion. I hope you have a nice life. 

You just keep saying “nuh uh” as if repeating it is somehow going to make your assumption correct. Was a vegan mean to you once and now you’ve decided to go on this crusade?

Look, we can do this dance all you want. But you’re the one stringing together a few facts to make a conclusion that doesn’t flow from those facts. I learned this in my Logic 101 class in college. Your conclusion is not supported by your premises. You need more information for your conclusion to be true. The burden of…

You think vegans are sitting around eating a bunch of highly processed fake shit when that’s not what we do.

Right, because gorillas are dairy farmers. Fucko.

No, I don’t agree with your comparison. You are comparing a highly processed vegan food item to a non-processed, non-vegan item. It is logically equivalent to comparing highly processed and non-processed items that are both non-vegan.