Wait, though; is that the actual doll? Or a model dressed as one? Because that’s some seriously Uncanny Valley stuff going on.

I think this is the fallacy of “diversity for diversity’s sake” or as some call it, equal opportunity. The point is never to hire a woman or minority to fill some sort of quota, the point is that for any given job there is probably a woman just as qualified, and it is good for everyone involved to find that person.…

So I am very much awake and actually know how to read.

If you had neighbors like Iran has, you would want to beef up your military as well

Um... the deal has actually worked if you bother researching or read news from impartial news organization (BBC, Politico, Reuter etc) Besides they only get $50 billion and that is not much of money when considering Iran’s entire military is outdated and the money has to be spent elsewhere as well.

So U.S. didn’t give Iran a dime. Iran just can recover frozen assets oversea (about $50 billion) and the sanctions were losing legitimacy. The world is certainly safer with one less nuclear bomb owning country.

I don’t understand... When did they drop any pretense of compliance with the nuclear deal?

Buzz is a well known NSA Bot here to push a pro war agenda.

Weird how your insight is directly opposed to almost everyone involved except republicans. Must have some pretty high placed sources in Iran telling you their plans, eh?

So what? Iran is no threat to the US, except vis a vis Isreal

It isn’t, which is why we’ll need to reach a new agreement before then. 10 years is way better than six months.

I don’t have a big issue with this (other than increased militarization that is rarely ever good for anyone, anywhere).

Why? Even the CIA have admitted they haven’t had a nuclear weapons program since 2002.

Then that’s what we were going to end up with anyway, as those sanctions weren’t going to hold.

This was a completely foreseeable and foreseen outcome. A conventional arms race in the Persian Gulf is better than a nuclear one.

So, you’re saying an uncooperative, nuclear armed Iran is a better option than an Iran that’s willing to compromise with us and has some updated conventional weapons?

I didn’t say you weren’t taking it seriously. I simply said I didn’t want to engage with you on the matter (I saw your comments elsewhere and have determined you are an anti-choice troll). Those aren’t the same thing. You said I wasn’t taking it seriously, which you based on my statement that I didn’t want to argue…

Yes, if someone doesn’t want to engage with anti-choice folks, they MUST not take it seriously. Piss off.

I made a whole response but I don’t feel like engaging with an anti-choice nitwit. Good day.

“Which it probably is”