But it’s saying that her position on those issues are not the same as the Republicans? Unless, some are (if so, which ones)? Unless I’m misreading what it’s trying to say.
But it’s saying that her position on those issues are not the same as the Republicans? Unless, some are (if so, which ones)? Unless I’m misreading what it’s trying to say.
I’ve read that the governor had always intended to veto the bill and had indicated this previously, but by waiting this long a deadline has passed when it could be resubmitted (though that might not be totally correct, it was from a few days ago and I might have mixed up some of the details).
I’ve read that the governor had always intended to veto the bill and had indicated this previously, but by waiting this long a deadline has passed when it could be resubmitted (though that might not be totally correct, it was from a few days ago and I might have mixed up some of the details).
He went to get help and can be seen later taking care of the baby (see longer video):
He went to get help and can be seen later taking care of the baby (see longer video):
He went to get help and can be seen later taking care of the baby (see longer video):
He went to get help and can be seen later taking care of the baby (see longer video):
He went to get help and can be seen later taking care of the baby (see longer video):
He went to get help and can be seen later taking care of the baby (see longer video):
He went to get help and can be seen later taking care of the baby (see longer video):
I think they are blaming her (for no other reason than she expresses personal views online that they don’t like, while working for Nintendo) for what they are seeing as “censorship” in the converted versions of games that are being exported from Japan, even though her role in the company isn’t related to that.
“You cant cast a fat person as an action star”.
Donald Trump’s history of suggesting Obama is a Muslim:
I think maybe the reason for the confusion happening is that you used the word “post” instead of “comment” so it looks like you are referring to the whole article. That’s how I read it initially as well.
There are some other comments with a similar discussion and a link to this article was provided:
I found this article which lists Chernobyl and other places where a lack of human presence has been good for wildlife:
Even if they made money from people viewing those specific videos a lot of those same people are probably not going to never watch any future videos of theirs. Also a lot of potential future subscribers as well are going to be avoiding them now.
I think that thumbnail is from the first video. I don’t think they have made a third video, there is only the written apology. Any new video would probably just get the same negative reaction again.
I think a problem for them might be the people who have never heard of them before, but will now not subscribe to them in the future and also refuse to watch their videos, so they’ve also lost a large group of potential future subscribers and viewers, and not just the ones who have seen the original videos and are…