An over-reliance on Bat-tanks not withstanding, the Arkham game series was the perfect close to the Conroy/Hamill era of Batman

How many 80s/90s remakes/reboots/long-delayed sequels in a row have flopped now?

One.

The one that immediately preceded Blade Runner 2049, IT, has been very successful.

Yeah, I feel like... the very first MCU film was explicitly about a guy learning how being Northrop Grumman is bad.

Shrugging off NG’s role in our decades-long campaign of blowing up children is way more cynical.

HAHA, I ONCE GOT FIRED BY DEFY MEDIA!

Or the time the Avengers all had to stay at different Howard Johnson’s because Ultron split himself into different bodies around the country and they then defeated him with the power of a good night’s sleep. I don’t know if you were making a joke but I’m not.

Our reality is some other reality’s most ingenious work of satire.

They’re saying it’s time to stop worrying about the coming nuclear war and start welcoming it.

Yes. You should care about other people. You should be in favor of social justice. It shouldn’t be that hard to understand. I don’t care if social justice makes you uncomfortable sometimes. It’s a lot better than the alternative.

Ugh, phrasing.

Why would anyone think Ramona was a cat? They don’t smile or get super excited when they see other cats.

Settle down guy

I don’t see any mention of copying, merely a comparison. Something can be similar to something that came after, and it would be odd to edit the statement so it says that Firefly is similar to Cowboy Bebop, considering the subject of the article.

This is only phase one of God’s plan, which he calls “Operation: Blood Puma.”

“God lets everything happen for a reason”

did you not notice that children never died in horrific accidents before the miracle of heart transplants would redress the balance?

I hate “it’s all in God’s plan” but I hate “We couldn’t possibly understand God’s plan” even more. Like, God’s plan presumably involves some specific configuration of matter and energy in the universe, so even if we couldn’t understand what that particular configuration was, surely it wouldn’t hurt if it were told to…

I would also like to stand up for the “third party analysis” being poorly described in this article. I just read the book in question, Is the Cat in the Hat Racist? by Phil Nel, for a graduate class and its discussion is far more nuanced than it is being represented in this article. Nel acknowledges Seuss’ anti-racist…

Are those goddam Star-Bellies stirring up shit again!?

doesn’t Pence read Trump The Butter Battle Book every night before bed?

“...an Eight-Nozzled Elephant-Toted Boom Blitz / that fires high explosive sour cherry stone pits!”
“Just like North Korea??”
“That’s right, Donny. Now drink your milk.”