No I mean that would be true of most Biblical literalists but with WBC the answer to those questions might actually be yes

The Jewish stuff gets a buy in Acts though

I dunno, I've heard of my grandma

I mean I guess there could just be a filter that replaced all comments with random segments from bell hooks poems

It's not just that your dick goes soft. I almost always become disinterested in sex for about 10 minutes after an orgasm, and since this has not been true of my previous partners, ladies first was kind of logical. So I don't think it's just a cultural thing.

Obviously you should still ensure that your partner has a…

Well, I think they did that because they thought it was funny, but shrug whatever I guess

It's also, like, barely porn

They were also spammed in the comments... you could even *like* rape/gore porn gifs and still see the difference

I'm basically with you up to here: And if it provides some prime jilling material for later...

Are you suggesting that there exists someone who might actually use these images as porn? Cause, like, Jesus buy yourself a Playgirl or something. An American Apparel ad. Anything.

This is a reeaaaach bruh

Sorry I meant that monogamy is assumed by default, not that it's boring. I can see why this was confusing though.

Absolutely.

But we might nevertheless be critical of monogamy's being the 'plain vanilla' of sexual relationships, which I think is more the point.

I kind of liked minxymaxx1's distinction more (paraphilias involve obsession and objectification) since it seems less socially dependent, but fair enough.

Anyway the important thing about an "orientation" that the logic of the article uses is that an orientation is involuntary and near-impossible to change, so while I…

Do you really think it's wrong to *want* to rape children, given that it's beyond your control? I think in general things you can't help can't really be understood as moral failings.

ohtoronto was asking about the difference between an "orientation" and a "paraphilia", not between homosexuality and pedophilia.

That was arguably the subject of the entire article...

I think a reasonable definition of "sexuality" is "network of sexual desires one has little control over". That's I think how most people understand the term at least. Pedophilia seems to qualify. Obviously it's still wrong to rape children.

Fair enough, but from the little you've written it seems like you're inventing two different words for the same thing in order to make pedophilia seem artificially curable. Maybe if you could explain what distinguishes a sexual orientation from this second thing that pedophilia is.

What is the operational difference between a "sexual orientation" and a "paraphilic disorder"? It seems like they both mean a "more or less immutable desire for a certain kind of sex".

Are you just trying to prevent guilt-by-association "pedophiles and LGBT people are the same!" type stuff? I feel for you in that…

I'm legitimately interested: what specific stylings make a bald guy handsome? I think being bald constrains the possible "good looks" even though it's still possible to look good but I'm not sure exactly how.

Motivation: I might go bald in ten years and I'm vain

Well presumably it's possible to have hair and also be comfortable in one's own skin

Are there really people who especially dislike short brunettes or were you just writing quickly?