I'm a man and given my family history I might go bald in the next decade or so. I'd be thrilled to therefore know what other character traits one might nurture to become a "sexy" bald man. TELL ALL
I'm a man and given my family history I might go bald in the next decade or so. I'd be thrilled to therefore know what other character traits one might nurture to become a "sexy" bald man. TELL ALL
Only if he takes Propecia
It wouldn't be, of course, except that it seems to cause heart attacks.
I think that would actually be an option for a lot of congregations, but they'd probably want you to bring a marriage certificate into the theatre or something
I was agreeing with you
You're maybe reading a bit much into that one sentence comment
OP was saying that *some* servers make good money. You are saying *most* servers don't. Those are entirely consistent statements.
I'm pretty sure "to ensure promptness" is an urban legend.
It might be a bit different in Quebec, also. I'm not sure.
Rules for anywhere outside of Alberta (where the economy is filled with oil money):
>Restaurants: tip between 15 and 20% on the pre-tax sum. 5-10% makes it ambiguous whether you're trying to insult the server or are just cheap, so if you'd like to do the former leave a penny. This is generally a bad idea, since…
Well, I think the interesting statistic is the % of the subpopulation *already* infected, not the number of new infections. But whatever the exact numbers, if it were true that Black women were as likely to be HIV+ as gay men, then yes it would make sense to exclude them.
The current probability of getting HIV from a…
It's not just costs. It's also the risk of false positives, which is actually pretty significant. I'm not really sure why you say the ban is dumb at the end, since you give a pretty good argument that it isn't.
If scalfin's number are true, a room full of 10,000 Black people will have many fewer HIV+'s than a room full of 10,000 MSMs, which is basically what you care about.
Lab screening gives a false negative about 0.3% of the time, which given the volume of blood we're talking about isn't good enough. You have to also stop HIV+ blood from getting to the test in the first place.
I'd have been inclined to agree, but if the OPs stats are really accurate it seems like you are in fact interested in who the donor rubs genitals with.
The test gives a false negative 0.3% of the time. That's a pretty small number, but not small enough: you're going to be rolling the dice many hundreds of thousands of times, and even one HIV transmission would be very bad.
Well, anyone who works with computers basically has an office job.
They're scrapping it and replacing it with a new one. There is no way in hell the University of Ottawa is going to go without a hockey program trust
Of course the show will in fact favour the male perspective, since it's on Fox News. All I've been saying this whole time is that you can't infer this from the name.
Ok. Honestly I'm not sure why I'm continuing to engage with you over this trivia. But please explain why you think the name outnumbered implies the show will take the male perspective, noting that I nevertheless think the show will be sexist and dumb.