I mean standing in one place to masturbate, even in public, is not rampage behavior.

I was annoyed at this comment until the last two glorious sentences.

I saw Insane Masturbatory Rampage open for Slayer in '92.

Billy, I hate to nitpick, but I have a problem with the headline. The phrase "insane, masturbatory rampage" should be "insane masturbatory rampage." You shouldn't use a comma when the last adjective outranks its predecessor and is an integral part of the noun phrase. In this case, the rampage is not both insane…

Rich J on Gawker thinks it's the worst thing ever. I don't get their hatred.

I can claim no understanding of how my gender thinks this to be appropriate.

I think it's more "doing something by yourself" vs "begging the other person to come back."

Not if your the type into BBWs!

"Fact: Everything I'm saying is supposition."

The description of this post as "fact-checking" needs to be fact-checked.

I first read the headline thinking you meant this kind of Roomba:

Perhaps... but then it wouldn't be anywhere near as valuable as clickbait.

As a longtime bleeding heart liberal, this article is so unbelivably self-serving and disingenuous.

Is this really where we are? That its not about people not wanting to contract a horrible, painful, mostly fatal disease? Surely it cant be that.

Waiiiiiiit. Threatening to throw away toys is normal. I'lol throw away anyone's toys right now, just test me.

Cue the race-baiting, preemptive attacks on anybody who might critique the article's premise.

"The sanitary crusade of the nineteenth century is central to the violent project of empire."

Can we discuss the country band called "Lady Antebellum"?

Let me see if I understand this. This writer is ostensibly trying to present her positively, yet describes her as "earnest as quinoa?" I get that the writer is probably trying to be clever, but "earnest as quinoa?" Earnest as quinoa. That phrase is going to rattle around in my brain for at least the next for…