tektrk
tektryk
tektrk

I haven't read his book, but have you? Or are you repeating what people that have a political agenda have said about his book? Having religious parents doesn't mean someone necessarily mean you follow their religion. I was raised Methodist but don't believe in it as an adult. Also, you haven't pointed to specific,

Where did you get your numbers? You do realize how simply typing numbers into a comment box is not credible to someone who disagrees with your initial statement, right? I would also point out that even if your figures are correct (and the Bureau of Labor Statistics says it isn't), 27% is not a majority of the

1. What evidence do you have that Donald Trump won the popular vote?
2. What evidence do you have that enough undocumented immigrants voted for Hillary Clinton so that she won the popular vote?
3. What evidence do you have that non-Trump voters want the country to not prosper?
4. What evidence do you have that Barack

The Left is not a monolith. Neither is the Right. Tired of being lumped in with avowed racists, homophobes, the un/under-educated? Then stop saying 'liberal' and 'social justice warrior' as if they're synonymous. Healing the civic divide starts with us and it starts by not making the "other" a monolith.

Everything you posted is true, but I'm not sure I understand the point. Nationally more people identify with the Democratic party. That's why in 6 of the last 7 presidential elections, the Democrat has won more votes. It's the geography of these votes that has propelled Trump to the White House.

London Has Fallen was certainly not a good film, but it also had no pretensions of being a good film. It's a shoot-em up with an outrageous body count and ethnic bad guys. Nearly every Schwarzenegger film from the 80's and 90's fits this bill. Kinda bugs me that it's number one, considering it operated under no

So… they're definitely boning, right?

I have caught maybe 3 minutes while I'm in the kitchen as my two 23 year old roommates (I'm 28) watch and fawn over Glover. The man has talent, but I have disliked all 3 minutes I've half watched while fixing a sandwich. Glad to know my kneejerk negative reaction has some basis in reality.

Can. You. Hear. Me?

I find myself falling into this trap too. I've gone through Parks and Rec at least 3 times in the past 4 years and I've only seen 4 of the shows on this list… What is wrong with me!?!?!

These band names are brilliant. As was the swastika turning into $19.39 (another great joke).

The position you've espoused (and I'll make the clarification that I don't know if you believe it, or are simply arguing it to show another side - a task I can respect as I often do that myself) suffers from a fundamental misunderstanding of what the LGBTQ push for full recognition and the government's hand in

Conservatism has strong points on some economic issues as I see it. Reduced corporate tax rates, balancing an income tax with some kind of consumption tax, etc. But on social issues, there is no real argument other than "I just don't like it".

Because of the intellectual dishonesty of comparing Black Lives Matter, a protest group comprising hundreds of thousands, if not millions of active participants and supporters, and the Klu Klux Klan, a group composed of hundreds to tens of thousands (depending on the year) of avowed racists that used murder and

Splitting the popular and electoral votes is a very rare occurrence (4 out of 56 presidential contests). Abolishing the Electoral College is about a quick a way as possible to instigate an actual civil war. Being chosen by electors force campaigns to cover the entire country, as opposed to holding rallies along the

Her arguments inevitably boil down to 'but when white people do it, it's different' or 'white people aren't a monolith, but all minorities are'. She's continuing uniquely the American tradition of pretty, blonde, petite white women ineffectually arguing the case for bigotry while their fetid, porkish, future

Fair warning, avoid the comments section of the Joss Whedon section. It made me so sad.

Unethical, sure. Requiring 1,425,967 House Committee hearings? Illegal? Disqualifying? I don't think it rises to that level.

I'm pretty well-versed regarding the whole 'email scandal'. What do you think is so damaging?

It's certainly close, but Clinton is averaging a 3 point lead nationally. It would take a revelation of criminal wrongdoing, as in a real crime was broken, not the Jason Chaffetz definition of crime (see, any action taken by Hillary Clinton), for things to tighten closer. I think we'll end up around 52 Clinton, 46