This is a brutal take.

Are the writers here just bored anymore? Doctor of opinions over here trying to fluff that paycheck. Imagine thinking using periods right now in the world is an issue that warrants this type of write up...

Italy has been on lockdown for 16 days.  Some of our states have gone on lockdown and the president is pressuring people to end them.  If we had a functional leader we could be on the road to improvement too.

We haven’t even gotten to the fun part yet.  There’s no situation that bad leadership can’t make worse, and look who’s in charge.

He got what he deserved. It was a stupid move & he should’ve known that, kidding or not, you simply can’t do shit like this. Lack of common sense will bury you nowadays.

Window seat runs the show here. “If you are seated by a window and do not feel capable of normal human interaction in the event of a disagreement, please alert a flight attendant and we will try to accommodate a new seat assignment.”

Window seat occupant has control of any window between the face of their seat back (the part their back rests against) and the face of the set back in front of them (the part their neighbor’s back rests against), all seats in their upright and locked positions. If a window is, in any part, forward of your seat back…

The window seat has the window. The aisle has extra elbow room. That’s why you pick either window or aisle. The middle seat is fucked.

“We knew people had died there, but it was the ‘80s” is the best synopsis of that decade I can think of.

Whether she knew what he was doing or not is immaterial (though given that she’s been queen for 67 years and suffered 14 prime ministers, I think it’s more likely than not that she knew what he was up to), because doing anything other that following the advice of her ministers would have resulted in a constitutional…

The Queen understood what Boris was up to, but under the rules the Queen had no option but to agree to the porogation.

She doesn’t have the power to do that. It would be a constitutional crisis for her to refuse. 

The queen refusing to shut down parliament (and asserting monarchal control) would have been a governmental crisis. She doesn’t veto things. She doesn’t make policy/procedural decisions. She’s a figurehead and diplomat. 

When the Queen tried to get Margaret to not marry Armstrong-Jones, I really hoped that the conversation went more like “I’m telling you this because you’re my sister and I love you. He’s a degenerate and you’ll be miserable.” The way it was portrayed on The Crown made me really mad at the Queen.

Just the fact that the show (which I’ve enjoyed) uses conversations that no one but the two people having it at the time, could have known about, means the whole thing is wholecloth.

I sometimes wonder about how surreal it must feel to have your family shit dramatized. Every family has shit but to see it on a TV screen and know millions of others are seeing it too would mess my shit up.

If the bars in Dodger Stadium don’t start selling “Negrónis” made with blood orange vermouth and garnished with lemongrass, they’re missing a wonderful marketing opportunity…

No. No, most of us do not. At all.

That’s baseball, Suzyn.

You are correct Bobby. The writer is just a troll looking to stir up a BS Twitter controversy. Then cry when people call her on it.