tangodave
David Rochlin
tangodave

“The situation in American law is that allowing a dangerous suspect to escape, deliberately allowing that, can be negligence on the part of police officer or department.”

Once the cops were called, then at that time, regardless of how nice they were, they, the airport police were responsible for the decision to jail Rosetta. The airline crew does not make that decision.”

That aircraft was not fit for human accommodation and was in fact, a biohazard.

I only recently moved back to the UK, I spent my entire adult life in the U.S. so I know shooting tyres is generally not part of the training. But I feel like it should be?

It’s funny that you see race as the cause of failure, but want to believe that being of colour is what has made her successful instead of facing that possibility that being black in America isn’t the great advantage you have no basis to claim.

Yes. And I’m sort of band-aid colored. I always felt bad that other kids couldn’t hide their band-aids by having them blend in like mine did. Once they became more arty I can see your point of view about Loony Tunes ones, but while artistically colored band-aids have been available for a century, they certainly

Hate laws were designed to put more people in prison for longer periods of time. Its the same old trick on humans.

Look at every single “book” written by senators congressmen, aides, et al. Its the oldest game in the book, next to “land deals” or “stock options”.

I doubt the modest fine for public nudity would have hurt her as much as internet immortality will.

Hush, troll; be quite.  Grown folks are speaking.

I don’t think it will be used that way. If anything, the way it is reported in this blog, the law is so vague that it will likely be unenforceable or perhaps even ruled unconstitutional.

“Give them an inch and they take a mile” is a pretty solid reason why my politics have actually shifted right since 2016.

Individual prosecutors using that level of discrimination feels super icky. Of course discretion is part of the job, but fundamental definitions of what laws apply to who? No way.

The definition they are supposed to be following is “on the basis of a person’s race, religion, or national origin when engaging in a

Do you ever read/edit what you type?

First, it’s a finagle offense, not a reason to arrest someone, so no, it isn’t some backhand way for blacks to get arrested.

It’s not to create new votes.

You do know its literally illegal to make one policy that applies to one race of people, and one policy that applies to another? Thats like “Instant firing, federal government swarms in and checks everyones receipts to find more people to fire” stuff.

Do you have to insert a WHOLE one or skin and mince it first?

No we would much rather vote for felons, than let convicts vote.