you do realize democrats put the structure allowing this “nuclear option” in place right?

The “standard rules” were always able to be rewritten at a moment’s notice by whoever holds a majority position in the Senate though.

I appreciate that this article includes a number of sensible quotes from pro-life marchers. I still disagree, but it’s important that we can at least understand each other’s positions.

Came here to post this.

I agree with most everything you say here except for the pigs bit. Those pigs are feral and descended from a group that’s been there a long time.

Is this what we’re referring too?

Yeah, I’d assume the point was to clear the streets of people breaking shit and anyone who was marching with people breaking shit.

So regarding reading people their rights, it isn’t a mandate. It just means anything you say to them can’t be used against you in a court of law. My lawyer tried the whole, “He was never read his rights” argument during a court appearance for an underage and the judge just said that only matters if the police were…

“They were not, he said, ever read their rights or formally informed what charges they were facing.”

See any of those Randy Rainbow videos? Funny guy, but in one the joke seems to largely be that Melania Trump has trouble with English, and another has a joke about the horror of Kellyann Conway in a 2 piece.

Ah, yes. Women are always responsible for the shitty actions of the men around them.

This. There have been a HUGE uptick in car break-ins and thefts in my neighborhood.

Let me guess, you’re someone who is easily offended, likes to jump to conclusions, make ridiculous assumptions and accusations and likes to pin everything on race?

Shut the fuck up and grow up. Take your uncontrollable anger somewhere else.

This isn’t SWATing. SWATing is INTENTIONALLY calling the police on someone you KNOW isn’t doing anything illegal. It’s fucking attempted murder, don’t conflate it with this.

Sure, lets all harass the woman, to show her for her actions unknowingly leading to an innocent mans harassment.. that makes sense. Sure her perception should be changed, but the problem would’ve been avoided had the police acted professionally. Asked him to stand at the side while they review the documents. He…

I’m with you on that, even if she was racist (don’t know one way or another) nobody should be calling and harassing her.

Keep little events like this in mind whenever Gawker family sites get sanctimonious about doxxing and any movement they claim does “internet harassment”. They let this comment through and left up the person’s name and number for at least an hour.

95% statistics are made up 100% of the time.

So she never actually “admits” to profiling at all but is worried she is because the prevalence of attitudes like yours make her feel guilty and afraid about doing the right thing, got it.

As someone who had their car stolen, I wish there was nosey person around who saw them fiddling with my car handle and fiddling around inside the car before stealing it so they could call the cops.