superfudge
superfudge
superfudge

Was just looking at those!

My problem is my 'bike' is a Ural so it has an extra 3 feet of 'bike' hanging off the right side ;-). The 7' Livinlite would work for sure!

Oh man - that ADAK!

My problem is - I want something designed well (and minimalist) but still need to fit two adults and two tweens. If I could get a Basecamp priced low enough, I could fab another set of fold-up bunks and still be able to throw a motorcycle in there.

I'm not a huge fan of the soft sides either - my

Regarding the Mobys - they're designed for long distance, cross-country hauls on brutal terrain.

Often times people just want a comfortable place to sleep, maybe conditioned for hot/cold nights. For the price and the capabilities - if you need one, they're hard to beat...

You certainly don't need one to hang out at

Maybe the Moby1 XTR is more 'Raptor'

Good luck finding a decent used Basecamp - they're the unicorn of the travel trailer world. Big, white and fiberglass - no problem; Aluminum, nicely designed and can carry a motorcycle, forget about it.

Another nice trailer without the hauling capabilities is the Cricket - super cool design with a lot of common sense

"We bought it because it was cheap, and that's exactly how it felt, thanks mostly to random pieces coming off in the cabin day after day, numerous electrical glitches and the power windows falling into the doors on a regular basis."

Share this bitch with VW and lets finally get the Westfalia back!

This doesn't seem like a good technology to add to a car company with notable quality 'challenges' with electronics.

I'm torn really.

I totally get the insane 3.1 to 60, I totally get all the technology and even acknowledge that this will likely be the future of automobiles...but it most definitely wouldn't be where I'd put my money. (HANDS OVER JALOPNIK CARD).

For me, its a ton of novelty and not a lot of passion. I do REALLY like

If you said anything other than Baretta, you're wrong.

If you said anything other than Baretta, you're wrong.

Pantsless in Pennsylvania - we sure this isn't Demuro?

That's not a station wagon - it's a Dodge Journey.

If this is what full size wagons are becoming, we should all be thankful Mercedes still builds a proper E class wagon. Comfort, utility and sport don't need to be mutually exclusive.

I suggest the 2014 Ural MIR.

1. Great in snow.
2. Great resale.
3. Takes up less room than a car.
4. No issues with ground clearance.
5. More cargo capacity than the 360.
6. MANUAL TRANSMISSION
7. Not a Ferrari (or VW).
8. Convertible
9. It dogs, kids and girlfriends well (not simultaneously)
10. Solar tender/charger to

In the words of Macamamera...

Have Gorilla, can confirm.

I hear it comes with a free copy of 'Duke Nukem Forever' preloaded on the giant LCD! #vaporwarejoke

you bet - happy to help!

1. If you don't need all the farkles - you can EASILY walk away with an Abarth under $20K...there's always money laying on the hood. I bought my 2013 in December 2012 - MSRP, $25K (it has the 17" wheels, heated seats and dual zone climate thing) and I paid $20K and some change. The same should

I'm a big guy (6' 4", 235#) and I think your assessment is correct. Fine for 30m jaunts - any more and your boobs will hit your knees. Honestly - most of the issues that come with an Abarth are not surprises. Its a small car with low profile tires and hard suspension.

For me, overall quality has bee fine - but I did have the intermediate steer shaft issue (clucking from lock to lock) and has some body panel issues. Powertrain and electronics have been good.

There's no doubt the car is a blast to toss around, but comfort isn't entirely overrated ;-).

As an Abarth owner - this article resonates on just about every level.

With her siren song exhaust note - she woos the unexpecting into sacrificing vertebrae comfort for audible pleasure.