superdemon-old
superdemon
superdemon-old

the guidelines about how to wage war are explicitly for wars between muslims, as is the prohibition against violence. "unbelievers" (or, infidels) are not subject to those rules. and though 99% of muslims wont do things like this cowardly bombing, 70% of them think it is justifiable.

discussing it isnt an insult to my intelligence, the ridiculous notion that military personnel arent fully aware and capable of making an informed, responsible decision about killing for themselves is.

your entire argument is an insult to my intelligence. im being more polite than i ought to given that you are calling me an emotionally detached killer (nevermind that youre completely wrong).

your point is ridiculous. as an individual, i have a right to decide for myself what is right and wrong. as a society, our success depends upon our collective agreement on what is right and wrong. when two societies clash, the more successful society will have greater economic might, and thus greater capability to

the decision is philosophically simple because the consequences are easily predictable, and the right answer is obvious.

thanks for proving the point of my first sentence. i have never taken the decision lightly, nor has anyone i know. it is naive people like you who dont take the decision seriously enough.

youve probably never met people whove actually killed someone, have you? if you had asked them if they felt good about it (in this case, i will limit it to our military personnel that have gone to fight in iraq and afghanistan, not random people who killed their wife or something) and they will mostly say that though

its to be expected, so theres little point in arguing with people like this "sociologist," but he dramatically mis-and under-estimates modern volunteer military personnel. being volunteers, we (most of us) decided long before training that we were willing to kill other human beings. and contrary to his beliefs of us,

it is part of anonymous' MO (and 'arrogant kid' attitude) to claim to be misunderstood. they know what theyre doing will put them in jail for a long time (well, in europe- in the united states the fbi and cia just slap them on the wrist if they agree to work for the government), so mystery about their motives and thus

no, anonymous did that, not Anonymous. Anonymous is an actual hacking group that operates like a spy network using false names to keep their identities secret even from one another (mostly), anonymous is just random people on the internet doing retarded stuff and posting it to sites like 4chan and somethingawful. the

the web pushing camera doesnt follow your computer down the street to the thiefs house.

newsflash for you: the planet is not an organism, its a rock. rocks cannot get diseases. get a dictionary.

nice thing about a craft this small is that you cant put a parachute right on it. but yeah, this will not be an easy thing to get past the lawmakers.

similar styling is one thing, identical styling is quite another. they also steal the mechanical designs. ford made a deal with china to build factories in china to build fords, and they planted spies in the factory to steal all the technology, then built an identical factory to build identical cars with a different

i think you were attacking me personally because you started with "Chill." the condescension inherent in that is what makes it plain youre just another run-of-the-mill liberal douche, not the open-minded niceguy you pretend to be.

chill.

stewart has a history of being anti-war, so it would be silly to assume that this obviously anti-war statement is actually a war-neutral statement because you can take half of it out of context from the other half and possibly it might have maybe meant something other than the same old anti-war naivete as always. war

im not sure jon stewart meant to include 9/11 victims or not, but it doesnt seem that way to me. from the full context of his statement it seems to me hes saying we need to confront the consequences of our decision to wage war, not confront the consequences of not waging war.

jons stupidity is due to being a liberal, not because he is a jew.

you are an idiot. i said nothing about jews or zionists, nor do i have any anti-jew or anti-zionist feelings. stewarts idiocy is due simply to being a liberal.