international law doesnt exist. without enforcement, law is just ink on paper. the united nations main enforcement arm IS the united states, so basically we can do whatever we want because the un will not dare go to war with us to stop us. also, china never signed that treaty, thus china can claim ownership of the…

uh-huh, and ignorance is self-inflicted, as you prove by refusing to research anything on your own.

need is different than want. no one needs videogames at all, so talking about needs is irrelevant.

i completely understand the greater context, and addressed it at length in earlier posts without calling anyone an idiot. only your basically saying 'having young and attractive women as leads is sexist' earned that treatment.

for ac 1, i mapped sidestep to square/circle and look-up/down to triangle/ecks. firing and swording to l1/l2, boosting and jumping to r1/r2. took a bit to get used to, but i murdered my buddies after i got used to it. nowadays, i have to remap ac to put all the nonsense elsewhere than the analogs and the shoulders,…

fighting games are not a huge genre, sports games annihilate fighting games year after year. are those oversexualized? how about racing games, flight sims, music games, dance games? first person shooters are probably the single largest genre, i can count 10 in just the past 2 years that had zero sexualization…

gamers or companies? the government of china isnt one of the possible culprits?

they are true, i assume nothing. men and women are different, better and worse at different things, spatial intelligence is one of those things. why are you willing to believe that women are better at multitasking, yet unwilling to believe that men have better spatial intelligence?

i am serious, but of course my argument is designed to make anyone who disagrees as incapable of rationality as possible- so i thank you for the compliment. undercaps feign humility :)

"What draws exclusively women and not men to a mainstream game in the same way that busty babes are made to appeal to men?"

oh, women can absolutely get just as good at videogames as men, but most see no reason to.

no, by the caveat that they are true, it is not possible for my statements to be sexist. for instance, is it sexist to say that women have breasts and vaginas?

men also read more, and more men are writers. these are not legitimate examples of sexism any more than the use of english in america is an indication of languagism. you accuse me of stereotyping, but i said very plainly that that i was basing what i said on scientific facts. women are not naturally inclined to play…

most women will never play videogames, and most that do will never play certain genres. most women do not like videogames because they do not have good spatial intelligence, so they have difficulty translating and understanding what is happening in the games, and thus they are excessively difficult and visually…

the question is not if i would use it, it is if the cost of the equipment to use it is less than the savings garnered by doing so. if we could use our own urine to power our homes, it would likely be done underground, out of sight, and make no difference to our practical lives. but, there simply is no possible way…

your dismissal of the link is for ridiculous reasons, and you know it. otherwise you would refute the data.

my example of flat earthers is exaggeration to make a point, einstein is not the only modern example. most nutrition scientists agreed 20 years ago that the food pyramid was the ideal way for humans to eat, since then americans have gained 30 pounds, and the food pyramid has been completely proven wrong. the list of…

please just explain to me how over 90% of scientists believed einsteins theory of relativity was untrue.

"that appears to be substantive" sounds to me like youre judging substantiveness by whether it supports your point of view.

so, you have more interest in making any possible insult than finding out the truth for yourself? fair enough, it is your right to be as ignorant as you wish.