I’m trying to come up with a witty remark about the bat-shaped boob window, but I’m honestly stupefied.

Yeah, it boggles my mind when seemingly intelligent people preoccupy themselves with fancy digs and office toys when product is years from market. Désilets is a great creative mind but I’m thinking he probably shouldn’t be the one holding the pursestrings.

Can’t speak for everyone else, but I was busy having a job.

While I’m happy that Kathryn Hahn is suddenly in everything, I really wish her agent could find her something other than “the cool wife.”

Not to be That Person, Patricia, but since the game has only been out since September 2013, it probably isn’t accurate to say that people have been experimenting with it “for years.”

I’d say she’s in the same league as the actor playing her husband. But his looks aren’t important, right?

*konvenient

What days were “those days,” exactly?

Sure, but my understanding is that when it comes to actual depictions of nudity/sex, the genitals must be censored or blurred, right?

I apologize if I come off as an inbred hill bumpkin for asking this question, but is this attitude a Japanese thing? I mean, this is a country where pornography is only legal if the naughty bits are pixellated.

That’s a lot of boob tape.

I’m sorry that you’re so insecure with yourself that sleeping with a non-biological female would freak you out to the point that suicide is within the realm of relatability.

Look. Just because you don’t see the joke as hateful doesn’t mean that other people don’t. That’s my point. We can argue until the cows come home about it, but because opinions are subjective we’re not going to convince each other. Some people, me included, saw the joke as hateful. Others, you included, did not.…

Thank you for your opinion. It’s been noted.

If either of those things led me to commit suicide, then uh yes it does.

Yeah, okay.

Like I’ve said to everyone else who’s making this argument: You’re entitled to this interpretation. But surely you can see how people might have an opposite reading.

This is the relevant part of the text:

I read your comment three times and point seems to be “we don’t know anything, therefore nothing means anything, so you have no right to be offended.” What. Ever.

I don’t understand why people think it’s some sort of checkmate to argue that the “joke” is homophobic rather than transphobic. Okay, maybe it is, but neither are good things to put in your videogame.