I've seen three episodes of ATL and there was a slighter hint of comedy in the 3d episode. i respect it more than master of none which i feel is trying to win social importance points but perhaps it doesn't need to be sold as a comedy. The characters seem to have hard lives and are a but jaded , but I think that's…

Who is that?

Hey Grace and Frankie is a comedy and lady dynamite is hilarious. Casual is an interesting drama mislabelled as a comedy IMO and master of none, Atlanta, and togetherness are all dreary. Togetherness had one winning episode IMO (kick the can) be it got the comedy deanery balance right

Well, he'll likely be phased out of the show. He's not a cast member so they don't have to find things for Alec Baldwin to do, and I imagine his guest fee is expensive.

I turned it off at the 10 to 1 bc I was like, a Ron Howard impression a calculated game show, I couldn't figure out anything behind it.

What did he do in home alone2?

nbc has had little luck keeping anything going at all

I thought this one was really boring as opposed to most episodes. I'm not sure why. I think season premieres have an uphill battle with all the momentum gone. It also felt like relationshipless sex was something that was done before w/Greg and Rebecca and that the full ramifications of Josh and his girlfriend of…

it's a really really good sitcom so far. Not disputing that. I think there was absolutely nothing to lose if they could have kept things at this stage (Michael being in the dark) for a few more episodes if they had more humor they could mine. That they didn't tells me they might have had nothing left and I personally…

Yes! Moonraker does have an awesome poster. I can testify to that. I believe View to a Kill also has a pretty cool one in the same style. The image of Bond and Sutton on the rail of the Golden Gate Bridge w/the city and blimp in the background lends itself pretty easy to make a poster out of

To be fair, part of my shtick as a TV blogger is complaining about how hard it is to spell certain names right and calling myself out on my own idiocy. When I referred to Scoot McNairy as Scott McNaury for an entire season of Halt and Catch Fire reviewing, I just said something in the random notes comments like "from…

I love Nathan Rabin's choice and I'll even let the blatant book promotion slide bc I hear he needs the money which is a shame.

That's true most networks do screeners. I was once a critic and can tell you it can be very difficult to function without them. Think about it: if you only watch an episode once on the night it airs, think of how difficult it is to get down those quotes, and cover the plot points and intricacies of an episode in a…

Not that I didn't enjoy the contradictions in Janet: How she assured them it wasn't murder but then her post-death message and her pleading made them feel like murders.

hillarious. But as Bender on that episode of Futurama where he reproduces all the way to the subatomic level says: "That would be two things"

"His seeming eagerness to hit on the mentally disabled new Janet show that being dim doesn’t mean you can’t do damage." Yeah, but he's disabled himself. He doesn't understand Janet isn't a person and also, I don't believe hitting on a hologram was labelled as immoral on a show like Star Trek. In episodes like the arc…

"I actually said "What?", at the exact same time as Chidi, in the exact same way." During which part are you referring to?

Who's that?

it would have been a good episode if they didn't jump straight to the end game? I would have assumed the episode was getting to a point where Eleanor acknowledges she killed Janet just to save Michael, not confess to everything? why didn't they consider that middle ground?

No one's saying it's a genius show. In fact, the premise is starting to wear thin but it will be fun to pick apart those kinds of things when I get to the review.