no one said they thought you had to be perfectly obedient to not get shot by the place. i agree with you, but that’s hyperbolic distortion to prove a point and its disingenuous.

someone having a differing perspective equals an allyship problem? didn’t seem so simple and generic. i don’t necessarily agree at all that the officer was justified in his actions, but people are politely and painstakingly outlining their arguments here. your treating of people with a different viewpoint with ‘here…

no one said ‘she got what she was coming’

that’s not what they said.

“Walking into the yogurt shop was an act of bravery in and of itself, and so to be inundated with foods labeled for those with food sensitivities felt like an attack.”

Good Christ, how do these frail little baby ducklings of human beings ever manage to leave their house without a nervous breakdown? It’s frozen yogurt,…

The shrill browbeating of this opening paragraph and its brazenly-biased agenda sounds like a third grader wrote it.

THIS. RIGHT. HERE.

again, he didn’t fucking say that.

i’d like to believe reading comprehension is just difficult for these asshole faux-leftists, but i know better. along with so much else they’ve borrowed from the far right and rebranded as ‘progressive’, they’ve also adopted the rejection of facts (in this case, written words) in favor of what they feverishly wish…

that’s not what he said

wait. are you implying women and mothers are incapable of that sort of behavior? last i checked, they were born human, complete with human nature. double standards much? woof, indeed.

‘a paranoid nightmare of vindictiveness’ is what we’re calling ‘an epidemic of custody-case bias’ now? okay. 

Y’know, this site is very much a shrill, pearl-clutching, browbeating, and slanted shell of what it once was, but every so often a glimmer of the old AVC still shines through in such incredible puns as the one in this headline. Good stuff. 

And I guess, yeah, fuck this person for having empathy for their parent, too. What a piece of shit, eh? Fuck empathy!

‘You Don’t Have To Answer Every Question Demanded Of You Because Jezebel Decrees It Must Be So For You To Avoid A Petty Callout, St. Vincent’

Seriously, who the hell do you think you are? Shut up and sit down. You’re clearly a bigoted right-wing fascist masquerading as a progressive, a fraud. Grow up and get over your sad, petty bitterness and misdirected, entitled sense of superiority. You’re not helping. Hate is hate, dehumanizing anyone based on how…

And trying to invoke some sort of egregious injustice by forcing their delusional sense of moral outrage to encompass ‘power structures’ and other empty buzzwords doesn’t hide the interviewer’s craven sense of deep offense at Clark being uncomfortable divulging personal details, and their cynical attempt to spin this…

The lack of self-awareness of Jezebel’s tone here is almost breath-taking. ‘Solidarity, don’t drag other women! But fuck this one woman because she’s successful and famous and didn’t want to answer personal questions!’

It’s cool to dehumanize successful/wealthy people because they aren’t people with private lives and traumas, seems to be the gist of the dumb outrage over this. People feel owed everything by an artist, and cry they’re being mean if they don’t want to respond to such prodding. I think Annie showed remarkable restraint…

The narcissistic entitlement is stunning. You cannot mandate an artist tell you whatever you demand to know simply because of their art’s content. And you especially can’t then turn around and whine ‘power dynamic!’ when you’re the one then courting sympathy and attention by playing up some absurd ‘celebrities are so…