subnet6
subnet6
subnet6

"mistyping" wordsmith. Now you're just flat out lying. Too bad. I had hope for you. Resorting to lying is even worse than name calling. You're right about the bottom. Projection ftw.

You're right. Double negatives are technically valid. It just doesn't mean what you thought it did (again, unless you were complimenting me, thanks!). But hey, don't shoot the messenger. Just trying to help. Which is why I'll also tell you that "word smith" is actually just one word, not two. Ironic you'd botch that

I think the word you're looking for is projection since you're the only one involved in a ploy. And, just a tip, "back to" regression is like using a double negative. It's called redundancy. If someone had to back up to then regress, they would be moving forward again (but if that's how you meant it, thanks for the

There are no contradictions. And no face needs saving. Sounds like maybe you've left us again. Sorry to see you go. It was nice having you in the real world for a few minutes. I truly hope someday, you get the inherent humor of the early turtles. They're awesome when you know what you're reading.

I left a long time ago. I've mostly not been paying attention since you erupted into name calling. I just toss out a sentence or two each time you respond to give you a reason to carry on. You seemed kind of depressed when you realized that you had missed one of the core conceits of TMNT (my original proof it was

I don't think that's possible. But I'm sure you'll keep your head up and try.

Looks like you've got the self-importance thing (according to your own definition) down pat now. You get to say it's there so it is. Which is precisely what I was hoping to teach you with this lesson. It took me about 2 posts longer than I thought it would to lead you down that path (I really wanted you to get the

Oh cramp! Gotta have this. I played the heck out of the NES version back in the day. Loved that game. Then I got the other one, a pulpy investigation style adventure game,, De Ja Vu I think. It was fun too, but not as fantastic as Shadowgate.

Just you saying it's there doesn't make it there. Sorry. :(

Just reread the whole thing. No proof from you.

You can't just say that and make it true. Prove it.

I don't even know what that means.

You've proven nothing and you've started stealing my lines verbatim. Your "responses" have mostly been nonsensical or name-calling. I think you're back to trolling.

You never proved you had a Unicorn. You can't just say you have a Unicorn and expect me to believe you.

See, you're confused. I've already accused you of delusions and denial. You need to find your own assertions. Stealing mine doesn't cut it. It's just lazy. And I have no idea what "loaing" is. Is it a new-fangled thing like Facebooking? I don't do The Facebooking.

I've seen this movie and it has a 187 minute runtime. If they did an honest effort of showing everything that was wrong with it, I would expect that video to run pretty close to 187 minutes.

Now you're stealing my comebacks? At least be original. You were doing good early on. But now I feel like you're not even trying. If we're going to do this, you gotta bring your A game.

It's clicking. Good.

I've said nothing of the sort.

Bubble? Your capacity for projection is truly staggering. Denying the existence of proof doesn't make it cease to exist. I'm guessing the projection bubble is interfering with you realizing that you did exactly what you accuse me of doing.