subnet6
subnet6
subnet6

There you go projecting again.

I wouldn't know, as I've not done so either.

I think you can skip to the next lesson. You've got all that mastered.

This is pretty much how I live my life. I keep a year or two behind on pretty much anything gaming or tech related. It keeps all my costs way down. I avoid the dreck and when i do buy hardware, it's more mature, less prone to failure, smaller and cheaper.

Lesson #1: Don't appoint yourself to speak for something you are not intimately familiar with. That's a good place to start.

You're almost as bad at rationalizing your name-calling as you are rationalizing a lack of proof. Keep it up. I'm sure there are more names you can call me.

Could you name for me what, in your words are "most of them" when it comes to Nintendo games about illegally killing people? I'm honestly curious.

noun \ˈprüf\

My assertions were proven on day one. You simply rejected the evidence until I found a quote from the creator using the same term to describe his creation. That never should have been necessary. Anyway, it doesn't matter now. You're here, amongst us, in the real world. Please stay. It's nice here. The only sadness

It didn't take ME 5 days to get here. It took YOU five days to get here. Welcome to reality. Enjoy your stay.

Do you have a minute? This could take a while. ;)

Foundations don't crumble simply because someone refuses to acknowledge obvious proof. That's all you've done. I make point after point and you simply brush them aside with absurd rationalizations. Here's a great example:

Me: "He says explicitly that what he was doing was "more than mimicry" which completely contradicts your assertion that it is nothing more than "a rat mimicking". That through what he described as "more than mimicry" he was "slowly learning the mysterious martial art of Ninjutsu"."

Well, once you find it online somewhere, you'll see what I said is true.

In a couple of ways, sure. But in the ways that really mattered, they actually made it worse IMO.

Do like I did and go crack open the copy you bought when it was published almost 30 years ago.

Page 11

He says explicitly that what he was doing was "more than mimicry" which completely contradicts your assertion that it is nothing more than "a rat mimicking". That through what he described as "more than mimicry" he was "slowly learning the mysterious martial art of Ninjutsu". So if he's doing more than just mimicry,

Except the comic says explicitly otherwise. If you don't see more than mimicry, if you don't see a rat learning his masters art, then you just do not get this comic. Like, at all. Seriously. I highly recommend these books. They're very good. Inherently kind of silly, but very good. Give them a read. At least once

What's beside the rat? In the other frame? Are you seriously asserting that they've placed the human next to him in the same pose to make it clear that he's just "sitting up"? And NOT that he's training like his master? Because that's quite possibly the dumbest assessment conceivable. If you can't recognize a rat is