stylesw
swstyle
stylesw

Yes, the argument is just too narrow-minded for me. Women are objectified to sell all sorts if things, and we should be against all if them. Focusing on meat-selling media turns attention away from the actual problem, and I don’t really know what the goal of it is besides getting people who want to be ‘good’ feminists

“Also... some of the feminist instagram accounts keep saying that vegetarian or veganism is now a feminist issue”

LOL, no. If we can’t use any products that use sexualized women to sell them, we would have to boycott everything — especially PETA. It’s not even remotely confined to selling meat. It is completely far-fetched attempt to co-opt feminism to validate your particular dietary preferences. Total bullshit.

Sigh. Now we’re being compared to chickens? Wut?

This is why people hate PETA.

Do they also kick out their female soldiers for reporting their rapes?

My close friend in the Army told me she is forced to pee into a cup at night when she’s in the field, because even her fellow male soldiers said it wasn’t safe for her to use the bathrooms. To be clear, they were saying that she wasn’t safe from THEM, not the enemy. So how about this, military: We’ll register for the

You think women should be “just as subject,” even though their risk of violence within the U.S. Armed forces is much higher for women than it is for men. You’re asking women to take on a disproportionate amount of risk, in the name of equality

The military is a different place for women than men. We should not ask young women to take on Greater risk than we ask of our young men. With current rape culture, women do just that, when they volunteer for the armed forces. As it stands, it should remain voluntary. You can’t act like this would be an act of

If they’re not taking hormones they should not be allowed to compete. It’s not fair to grow your hips and shoulders and muscles on testosterone and then compete against people who grew theirs on oestrogen.

Do you honestly think there are many closeted trans men out there who are beating elite male athletes, despite having smaller lungs, hearts and skeletons?

Are you serious? I have no opinion regarding her/his choice of sexuality but that looks like a dude all day long, in every photo.

Don’t know. You seem to be advocating for an “open” division, i.e. everyone competes in the same division. That is completely fair, nothing would decide success other than how fast you can complete the race. It would also end women’s athletics, as the top women in the world would have difficulty placing in most, if

Hormones are not the only physical differences between men and women. Adjusting hormone levels may affect muscles, fat distribution, and (in the long-term) bone density. But it will not affect skeletal structure, lung capacity, heart size, or the other advantages that biological males have over biological females.

I don’t know what you mean.

I expect we’ll have some “great examples” in the future.

She certainly retains the male skeletal structure, which is functionally different than a female’s skeleton.

I find it genuinely fascinating how terms have shifted in the trans community over the years. When my cousin transitioned in the ninties, it was all but expected that, barring finances, you would have the sex change surgery (or at least the orchiectomy ). Until then, it was expected that you would have to take

It doesn’t matter at the level that she is running at, but when you get into the professionals, the amount of testosterone in a woman’s (or man’s) body can drastically improve her/his speed, giving some athletes what some would consider an “unfair” advantage.