It isn’t just the rock, it’s the person holding it, and that car looks like it had been the receiving end of some serious rage. There might have been enough left to do some serious damage — to the cop, to the victim of the domestic dispute, and perhaps to one or more of the many innocent bystanders in the vicinity.
swstyle
stylesw
I believe that Brock’s character was seriously affected by the alcohol he consumed, and I felt that the court needed to consider this issue during their sentencing
In vino veritas, beeyotch. The booze doesn’t CAUSE the behavior. It removes the filters and inhibitions that normally PREVENT the behavior. A guy who inherently doesn’t rape won’t suddenly turn into a rapist after a couple of beers.
This is what I was trying to remember- totally consist with self-reported multiple rapists.
I don’t see why it’s surprising. Doesn’t it make intuitive sense?
I’m trying really hard to keep my inner Lewis Black caged but, you know, the thing about serial rapists is that actually testing the motherfucking kits would help to catch and convict them and would lead to fewer rapes!
Again, I always wonder why we ever let these rapists out of prison at all.
Far more common than who thought? Because I’m pretty sure most women are not surprised by the news that when rapists get away with one rape, they go commit more. That’s what happens when a society doesn’t take rape as seriously as it should.
Yeah, but she’s a woman, not a human being. How could anyone think a little thing like raping a woman could warrant a punishment so awful that the poor rapist can no longer enjoy a good ribeye?
There’s a difference between “being on his side” and “being a narcissistic arsonist who just dumped napalm on a fire that was about to go out.”
No problem with him being on his kid’s side. Kind of a huge problem with him ISSUING A STATEMENT when his kid just got a criminally lenient sentence. Just shut the fuck up, let your kid serve his six months, and be grateful the world still revolves around privileged white guys.
I think respect goes both ways. As I said, I have no issue in public spaces accepting trans people. I want them to live and live well. At the public school level though, I think trans people have to understand that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
I think you are being obtuse. Do you have children? I am just supposed to be okay with my 10 old daughter using the bathroom with a biological male? I am supposed to feel comfortable when she is 13 and dealing with menstruation being in a room with a boy presenting himself as a girl? At 16, I am just supposed to say…
Why is it only EVER presented as “men going into the ladies room! Little GIRLS!! WOMEN AND LITTLE GIRLS!!” Anyone can be sexually assaulted. Anyone. Including men. Anywhere. Not just in bathrooms. Stop using me (woman) as a political pawn for bullshit!
We do not have to be afraid of trans people and in the adult world this isn’t an issue. The problem arises in public schools where parents of children with a differing gender identity over their biological sex are trying to demand equal rights where none exist.
At the core, this issue is about public schools and adults protecting children. There is no reason a minor female child in the public school system at ages typical of puberty be in a bathroom, changing room etc..with a biological male. Same for the reverse. It isn’t right.
It may be that rather than make any appropriate provision or allow people to go with how they identify, they’re just going to say, OK, anyone can use any restroom at the same time as anyone else.
While I like the idea of women confronting the Republican Nat Con, I cannot describe how GROSS this dude’s vision is.
“reflecting the knowledge and wisdom of progressive women and the concept of “Mother Nature””
“we hope to suggest that women are a reflection and embodiment of nature, the sun, the sky and the land.”
Of course the terrible terrible subtext is “Women don’t create any light of their own, they only reflect it back at the source.”