“they might just be vetting a potential United States president”
Actually, most.
Curiously, most of those donations will come from people who pray.
Gawker’s about clicks and exploiting people for $. This is the underbelly of the internet: take someone’s story in faux sympathy so you can generate ad revenue.
“But some of us look more deeply into a person before choosing them as objects of our lust.”
“...The Orlando killer, the San Bernardino killers, the Fort Hood killer...” all Muslims.
I think it’s magnificent that one of the internet tattle-rags gets shredded by their own petard. Words have meaning, and you can’t shit all over everyone and not eventually get payback.
Thousands of hours of labor to make it into a terrifically realistic environment and visuals.
Nearly 100 words with no punctuation. Yeah, that’s a “persuasive point” and not the frothing ravings of a fanboi.
If you don’t understand the simple phrase “looking masculine” it means you’re so far down the SJW rabbit hole nobody could even explain it to you.
“Close enough that most people couldn’t distinguish the difference” is in most cases good enough, except for pedants.
I read the article, and been following it since it was first discussed - Blizzard’s original response was figuratively “the dog ate my homework”.
Probably the reason it keeps getting asked is because (in this example) Blizzard (with their gajillion$) has repeatedly, firmly, loudly said “THIS CANNOT BE DONE”
Oh I think the only real wager is when, not if. And I’m going to guess the over/under’s probably not much more than a year.
So she’ll be president because she has a vagina, and her opponent is a boob. Curious, the synchronicity.
Considering that according to Jezebellians all men are more or less rapists anyway, yes, the headline is likely true.
You mean, aside from buying it for what, about $0.25 at your local used bookstore and supporting a local businessowner?
You mean, aside from buying it for what, about $0.25 at your local used bookstore and supporting a local…