If you're in the market for a completely different vehicle, then sure. But no one with $100,000 to burn on a car is deciding between a 1989 Ferrari and a new electric sedan.

I've seen one of these parading around Detroit a few times in the last few months. As someone else said, it's quite a nice sight, and it's a pretty attractive car for anyone with a lot of money who wants to be (occasionally) environmentally friendly.

That's a pretty crappy thing to say, and its relevance to the article is shabby at best. I really hope no one promotes your comment.

Should've picked a starred commenter, then.

Did I say it wasn't?

First of all, yes, there are many such apps. Second of all, RAM has nothing to do with storage. The iPhone 4S has at least 16GB of that.

Here's a little relevant top tip. After you are done "searching for gifts for a loved one's birthday," also clear your DNS cache. To someone a little more knowledgeable, it can sometimes reveal the sites you've recently visited.

Perhaps not the best taillights ever, but I have to throw these in the mix. They belong to the Wiesmann Roadster.

Didn't pay attention to that. My bad.

Now it's tomorrow.

Well, there's the obvious thing: its design. I'm not sure if it really gives it personality, but it makes it special.

I think you're missing a very crucial part of the study: the same person asked to cut in line every time. The only variable was the language used. Therefore, that is the significant factor.

Here's a frame that might help. If Nibbles doesn't approve, you can find the screenshot at [dl.dropbox.com]

I see the headlights, but then I also seen the little window behind the door, and it seems to have a flat bottom, as opposed to the Cayman's.

Maybe it's just me, but that looks a whole lot like a 350Z, rather than a Porsche.

So what's the key to posting pictures? Mine was a URL to a snap of the Gumpert Apollo: [custom.netcarshow.com]

I'm not sure if "fish" really describes it, but it does look like some kind of ugly creature. The Ferrari Ferrari Four was a second thought of mine.

Confusing as it may be (until I read that thread where some got banned, I was also confused), the headline is correct. The fact that it may cause some commenters/readers to learn something new is, in my opinion, a beneficial effect. It's just a pity to see so many people complaining when they haven't even attempted to…

Jesus was suggesting that they should've launched them properly in order to "have some fun." My point was that blowing them up all at once is the most fun way to do it. It's just that they could've done a better job of filming it.

The only thing they did wrong was blowing these up during the day. And framing the whole spectacle badly. And using a very crappy camera.