I dunno, I think that its not such a big deal. I personally don't care for sex, but I also don't think its such a big deal for someone to ask for it. I mean, I just say "no thanks, not interested". If they get pushy after that, then they're an asshole.

I am confused. How are questions about sex inappropriate on a dating website, exactly? What year is it, again? 1815?

I think you just have a really juvenile idea of what respect is. I mean, its just sex, right? All they are is asking for casual sex. All you have to do say "no". If they get pushy and obnoxious about it, yeah, that's disrespectful and then calling them an ass and blocking them is aproprate, but its really not a…

That's... rather unfair. I mean, you wouldn't not give a kid a piece of candy you bought for them just because they asked for it, right? I mean, right? Yeah, its your candy, and you bought it, and its your right to not give it, but shouldn't honesty be rewarded? Even if you didn't buy it for them, but you were just…

I thinks its a dramatic over simplification to imply that evolutionary theory and social theory are somehow mutually exclusive. Sexism is powerful, pervasive, and practically universal, which implies that sexism itself is in some part reinforced by an evolutionary trait. Which seems rather obvious to me, but maybe its…

Gah. All these comments are depressing. Swatters are undoubtedly stupid and wrong, but engaging in the 'I hope they fucking die' game is definitely the wrong response. Its that kind of rage based impulse posting that created a culture that breeds something like swatting. Other humans are people, and a fucking 14 year…

Fixed it.

Disassociate yourself with your beliefs, and realize this is fitness, not religion we're talking about.

Mmm, the video actually does have a lion.

You win.

AdBlock was both the best (mostly the best) amd worst thing that ever happened to me. I love not being constantly inudated with advertising, but my threashold of rage is so low now that if I have to wait on an add, I start howling and seeing red.

That kind of sounds like what most people would say about a relationship they are truly emotionally invested in.

I think that that's more related to how people who grow up in safe, stable homes are also much more influenced by societal indoctrination- i.e. they would have a harder time overcoming the taboo and pursuing the relationship in the first place.

Ugg, that's a terrible way to find out.

In some states. Many don't require it anymore, because sex before marriage is now the norm.

Actually, the blood test is for STDs, and was instituted when sex before marriage was a NONO.

Hmm, actually no. They do not put you at a "very high risk".

Yay science!

Because moderate impairment can be caused by more than just alcohol, and "moderate impairment" is not the same as "dangerous impairment"

Yes indeed. Which is why these arguments are completely dumb. I wouldn't have even bothered commenting if it didn't bother me so much when people repay (granted, self reported) kindness with cruelty.