This is an actually great read on Hillary as First Lady: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/06/us/…

In short: Really effective GOP propaganda machine, running for 25 years and counting.

LOL. This is straight GOP propaganda. Not even Sanders campaign propaganda, this is fucking Republican bullshit.

This is Bernie’s bill, introduced last year, to break up the banks: http://www.sanders.senate.gov/download/tbtfl…

Your reading of Libya, why we intervened and what we hoped to achieve is wrong.

Except the legal stuff has been front-and-center in his Senate work AND presidential campaign since 2008. EIGHT YEARS. EIGHT YEARS to figure out the legal implications of breaking up banks and prosecuting Wall Street, which is a direct consequence of a court decision. To say he shouldn’t know that is bullshit.…

Amen and preach it, please!

We are. Thanks, Tea Party and Libertarians. So glad you’re here.

What is wrong with you. Seriously, what is wrong with you, why are you always talking about your daughters in sexual ways. Stop it. Or maybe someone launch an investigation?

That’s totally fair. I remain fucking stunned and angry that Bernie couldn’t even gesture to those securities laws in his interview.

*claps and snaps*

I mean, I am sure there is a way to prosecute them but I don’t know it because I am a regular person who doesn’t work with the law and/or legislation and/or investigation. Bernie is. How does he not have an answer to that? How has he not memorized the legal statutes that could allow prosecution??

I haven’t been feeling the Bern, actually, but I trusted the experience he touted and the length of time he’s been working as a legislator. What the fuck has he been doing in Congress??

I am genuinely shocked by this interview. That’s not snark, or partisanship, or anything else. 26 years in Congress, all of them championing progressive goals, eight of them since the financial crisis, EIGHT YEARS as a sitting, working legislator during the financial crisis and you don’t even know the legal…

It is often very difficult to tell who is and isn’t a truly fringe candidate until they are running. Again: Look at Trump.

Again, that is just wrong. Would you say that Trump’s success shows that the GOP is wildly out of touch with its base? You could, but you could make a stronger argument that the backlash against Trump proves that he doesn’t reflect the party’s base, platforms, or views, and instead taps into a fringe element that is…

Nope. Literally nope. That’s why the GOP is in a panic right now trying to figure out how to ensure a contested convention so they can deny Trump the nomination. Once you’ve signed up with the party and started running your campaign and competing in primaries the only way to get out of it is to either lose or to…

Well, I told you in my original post but I will concede to your relatively poor reading comprehension and explain again.

I def played with dolls at 9. Ain’t nothin’ wrong with it. Ain’t nothin’ wrong with being a citizen journalist, either.

It’s cool! I know where you’re coming from! I dislike underinformed voters who rely on their own narrow, ahistorical view of the country and reject the greater good in the name of their own self-interest and use voting to punish the people trying to help them because they can’t help quickly enough, but I understand…