However, the chances of a steering shaft breaking are far, far, far, faaaaaaaarrrr less than the chances of a steer-by-wire system malfunctioning.

Has no one pointed out this:

Just a theoretical example: If it takes a driver 1 second to turn a traditional rack and pinion to full lock, what the fuck does lag matter on an electronic steering rack if it takes a driver 0.5s to get to full lock, plus 0.125s of lag. That would still be faster than a traditional system.

You can go lock-to-lock in a Cybertruck much faster than a conventional vehicle, which would make the lagginess even worse

Isn’t the ratio greatly quickened when stopped like this? So, at higher speed, the driver would likely have to turn the steering wheel even further, which would reduce the lag.

It had a tiny engine/generator (GM EcoTec?) and wasn’t the exhaust literally by the driver side window?

A four second Google search shows many forum conversations about charges for certain colors. Here’s one from 2005.

Porsche has been doing this forever?

The Tesla range claim scandal is widely misunderstood. The cars do, in fact, meet their EPA range on an EPA test. However, the EPA test doesn’t reflect most people’s driving conditions so it’s common to get somewhat less than that. 

The headline uses a really misleading statistic. The car STARTS with 73% of EPA range based on their undisclosed black box criteria. If you look at the actual article, it shows that Tesla’s average 90% of its battery capacity after 3 years- right in line with your car.

Today’s Republican party has lost the ability to plan ahead to make the country stronger positioned against the rest of the world.

Governments have to set goalposts for industry, or else nothing will change. Those posts can change position over time, but everyone needs a target. Think about smog reduction targets in the 80's. Have you recently driven behind a 70's era car? You can smell it half a mile behind. Imagine if every car on the road was…

Which, as far as degradation goes, seems pretty fuckin’ good. That means it retains ~91% (Model Y) or ~89% (Model 3) of original range performance. But again, this sounds good, but without comparing it to other manufacturers and models it’s hard to conclusively say.

What a weird metric. They were never at 100% of EPA range because Tesla apparently is able to score real well with the EPA test, but does horribly in real life. So saying they only achieve 64% of that is... well, kind of meaningless as far of “degradation” claims go. Give us what they actually started out with. Did…

research from the UK, 2013 to 2017, based on miles travelled. Massive skewing factor here will be where those vehicles travelled.

No matter what you think of the truck or anyone who buys them, yelling profanities at him, giving the guy the finger and spitting on/scratching his property makes you as bad if not worse of a person.

Actually I am speaking from experience with two stop signs within a mile of my house that get blown through all of the time.

Or people could actually take the extra 2 seconds and stop.

ValveTech did not make this valve. They had contract disputes on StarLiner, so they’re just opining on what they’re reading in the press. It comes off as sour grapes over a contract dispute. More detail over at Gizmodo.

Ryan, if you were a real journalist, you would clearly state that Boeing doesn't make the Atlas rocket. It's been pointed out many times in these comments, but you seem to lack the courage and basic journalistic integrity to issue a correction. Perhaps another line of work would suit you better.