The algorithm knows what you want to search for.

And little to nothing’s likely to happen, considering how desperately Mitch is packing every bench he can.

Fetlife, I’d guess, considering the nonsense from yesterday will likely end up being gospel in the White House.

Of course he lied under oath. It’s just a question of whether anyone can actually prove it.

It is sad when the best example of holding a guest accountable comes from Fox News (Wallace v Miller).

They’ve gotta stop letting him just rant over top of them. Rudy should absolutely be booked, but only in a way where you can entirely silence him at any moment. “Rudy, did you do X?” “Well, Joe Biden—” “I didn’t ask about Joe Biden.”

It’s the best way to prove your heroism, Rudy.  Just lay it all out on the table.  I promise it’ll go well.

You’ve made the classic mistake of assuming any of these people will follow through on their debts.

It’s one thing to obstruct your opponents from damaging your party. It’s quite another to try to stop someone bent on self-destruction when you were really only ever using them for your own ends. This’ll never reach a Senate trial, I agree, but it doesn’t have to to completely drive Agent Orange over the edge.

Please, Rudy.  Please follow through on this.  And make sure to get yourself booked for as many live interviews as possible.

Maybe not. The man too turtle-y for the Turtle Club has already gotten what he wanted out of Trump, namely two Supreme Court seats and four years of blatantly packing the lower courts with as many political hacks as possible. Even if this scandal results in Trump’s quick resignation (which I doubt), Mitch still gets…

So... we need the political equivalent of House?

“Room Full of Marks”

People keep using the “emperor has no clothes” analogy for Trump.  I honestly wouldn’t be surprised at all if he’s literally naked on the East Lawn before all this is over.

This is accurate, and somehow even more disgusting than if it was just sex.

It has to be Obama saying it.

I was the phone addict of my social group for a few years in the early days of smart phones. I blamed it on “needing to do something with my hands,” which isn’t entirely true or false.

I learned last night that “you” was once the plural form of “thy,” “thee,” and/or “thou.”  Apparently, in 1660, the founder of the Quaker religion wrote an entire book dedicated to calling those who used singular “you” fools and idiots.

I feel like it would work better with a softer fabric.