0

You can’t see anything, just looks like he trips and falls down and that’s all. Obviously it was much more than that. 

Breaking: Condescending man offended by condescending sentence in response, full story at 10.

Without factoring in any other factors, you’re right. Every play is either 6 points or it’s not. Unfortunately for your theory, there is a lot more involved. Having a single defensive play to overcome it, or a single defensive drive, isn’t “ample time” if you’re behind and you need points to win the game. The closer…

You sure are salty about a reply that had nothing disrespectful in it and was simply a different opinion/perspective.

Your larger context of Mahomes making those early plays making it where they wouldn’t have been in the position for the game to be close late is completely unknown. Score, time, momentum, and other…

A player (Mahomes) missing a pass that effects the outcome of the game is different than an official missing a call that has a major effect on the outcome of the game (keeping a drive alive and they score vs giving it back to a Chiefs team that was rolling offensively). Also, the closer to the end of the game said…

All systems are a compromise. SC’s take away a significant amount of power just to make the boost (40-60hp generally on street cars).

Twin scroll turbos, variable geometry turbos, and other technology (ceramic and titanium turbines) has eliminated the “quick spool or high rpm power” situation. It’s not nearly as…

Well, look how many people agree with you now...

Let me guess, you also think real men grab ‘em by the pu$$y?

Looks like you’re the joke according to the poll, and sales of the new 4 cyl Mustangs. 

Same 7.5" rear and a $35 boost controller away from having the same hp. 

You got one like so you’re not alone...one other person agrees!

The sealed beam design was already finished and approved for production (and these started hitting the dealerships in 83) so while the timing was close, it was too late. 

It’s not nearly as good as a front mount but it’s still way more efficient than having no intercooler at all. Drops air temps from the 250-270F range down to 150-170F. That’s a massive difference. A large modern front mount would get it down to 110-130F.

No, 79 Pace Cars weren’t SVO’s. They shared nothing other than both being Mustangs. Carb 2.3 Turbo does not have anything to do with the EFI version found in SVO’s. 

Typically people don’t buy 30 year old all original low mileage vehicles to drive them, or at least to drive them with any regularity. They have been treated like collectors items their whole life and will continue to be viewed as an investment, not a vehicle to drive. 

Somebody missed the part where this isn’t just a normal Mustang with a turbo 4 installed. Recaro seats with 5 way adjustment, leather wrapped steering wheel and shifter, Bi-wing, rear wheel spats, adjustable Koni shocks/struts at all 4 corners, the first Mustang with 4 wheel discs, first with 16" wheels, 5 lug, unique…

This car was developed before they were legalized (even if it was released at the same time or shortly after). So the money was already spent on the sealed beams. They couldn’t ditch all of that and get the aero version approved and manufactured immediately.

Depends on what sort of SC you’re talking about. Centrifugal are way more peaky than turbos since boost climbs linearly with RPM and therefore max boost is only available at max RPM. Roots style make more torque than turbos at real low RPM but are WAY less efficient (add more heat to the air while compressing), are…

It actually more than doubles it at the wheels. 70hp vs 165hp at the wheels. Torque is well over double as well. 15psi from a turbo will double (or more) the power of anything though.

There have never been more parts available for 2.3's than there are now.

Bottom end can handle a little over 400whp in stock form. Crank and block can handle over 700whp.