Agreed! My 5 year old has a better sense of layout and composition.

Oh, wow, no, sorry - I was agreeing with you - I’m blown away it is a high school - and a magnate one at that - student’s work.

High school student. HIGH SCHOOL.

No words for this. Can’t even.

83% of white Republicans and 47% of all white people still approve of the job he is doing as president

Not sure what’s worse, Twitter before or after IPO.

Any observations about drinking and conception? Asking for a friend.

“extra heaven points” - take my star, please!

Brutal, must-read.

He’s a crabby old dick.

Lost me with Django Unchained, and I was already on my way out with Inglourious Basterds.

I will add that a progressive should not run if they are simply perpetuating the status quo, and I am convinced by persuasive arguments by those who know a thing or two about it (again, experiences are critical) that we should work to develop candidates by placing a priority on POCs. If 30% of races are uncontested,…

Ah. I see.

Oh, gotcha. Thanks!

Again, point taken. What’s a NEDD? (Sorry, I have to utilize a big chunk of my acronym memory for my job.)

You’re quite right, and I appreciate the correction - “always” is indeed cynical and intellectually lazy on my part.

Point taken.

I’m okay with this -not that it is mine to approve or own, mind you. I would support such an effort. For instance, I’d say in my voting district there’s probably an even split between white & Mexican, and I can guarantee that the folks running are white.

File this under: What Took So Long? Later, QT, and keep your mitts off Star Trek.

I don’t want to leave the impression that I think a progressive should not run, especially given your 30% stat. That’s not what I mean at all. I’m saying maybe we use that white privilege to give up our seat at the table for once, instead of the white progressive always being The One Who Runs. Then again that’s what…