It could also be the way the article was written. People don't speak in complete, oxford comma-laden sentences. A lot of what people say looks really nonsensical when recorded verbatim, because there's so much nonverbal communication being left out. People are kind of shitty at speaking English.

The patriarchy isn't really that good for men, either.

My problem, aside from your initial remarks that you believe that there is a level field in terms of how offensive GIFs are targeted (they aren't) is the fact that your whole tone is patronizing. I don't care about your argument because it isn't important to me and in no way assists me. Giving deference or respect to…

I'm just done. I'm done trying to accomplish change while having to accommodate everyone's opinions. It's not working. It didn't work for Obama during the first year of his administration, and it's not going to work in Afghanistan where trying to secure women's rights could mean your life. And it's not going to work…

because no one has ever been unblocked by sending an email to the administrators, or has ever been capable of using ip blocking software or using another computer in order to fulfill their god given right to post comments to Gawker. Blocking spammers will cause zero detriment to Gawker.

You don't have to be an MRA to sound EXACTLY like them. "fire breathing feminists?" OH NO, ARE THEY ANGRY AT YOU? HOW DARE THEY. FLAAAAAAMES. But seriously, you absolutely fall into the category of trying to be more right than us. Because we so need more of that. Thank you so much for all of your help and expertise,…

yep, you're probably right, but you're still reading from the mansplaining book. Your phrasing sucks and you come off like a rape apologist. By the way, being sexually assaulted is not a currency you can just use to justify saying things like "some women feel like this" which is JUST as demeaning. Be realistic- we've…

Companies aren't free enterprises. They're beholden to their sponsors, and to their employees. The value of Gawker is the bylines of its writers, and the clicks from its users.

the fact that you even felt the need to come on this thread instead of jerking off or playing a video game or walking your dog demonstrates that something about the feminist ideology bothers you. That's good. Keep that up.

Oh, no, honey. Psychosis is disorganized, chaotic and without ideology. No programmatic, orientating functions there. Psychotic people imagine they have enemies, whereas you're a real person who really is in opposition to our real agenda. What you're really afraid of is women becoming socially dominant and turning…

Oh, we get it. You either don't actually know what's happening, or you don't care. Therefore you have nothing to offer us.

oh, and you know the difference? What's the difference between a standpoint feminist, a post-positivist feminist, and a liberal feminist?

So if someone punched you in the face as a kid, and broke your nose, you wouldn't be a victim of having been punched in the face just because your mouth was still capable of flapping? Fine logic. Also, the Guardian never actually said anything about killing white men. There is also no "men are cunts because" headline.…

It could be because men keep doing those things. Maybe you should stop telling us how we should feel about it and go tell them to stop it. "I'm assuming where some of that attitude is coming from." It's actually all contingent on shared experience that we don't instigate, but is instead, directed at us. Every day. So…

It takes a lot of guts to step down from your height and admit you've got something to learn. Even women can have a difficult time finding the right ethical path through the paradigm of feminism because not all feminists are the same, and not all people are the same. And it's also possible (for me, I know) to let…

Maybe you should go tell men to stop raping women, then, instead of telling us your feelings about it. That would actually be useful. But men haven't figured out that part of it, that they actually have to help stop violence against women by confronting other men. And yet here you are telling a bunch of feminists…

Do you have trouble with reading comprehension? It's the employees of Gawker telling the Gawker management to provide them with a way to address violations of their own community standards. We are supporting them, clearly. You obviously have no fucking clue what is actually going on here.

don't wear slutty HTML if you don't want to get trolled.

I think we should get our own Stand Your Lady Ground laws, just for people like you.

I hope someone breaks your legs, and you spend the rest of your life in a wheel chair, and that you have to witness the breaking of bones at least once a day. Better actually if you have three or four broken bones in the bargain, because that would probably accurately represent the accumulated amount of assault most…