I don’t understand why anyone thinks he’s vexing or perplexing. It seems quite clear what his deal is. Extreme show of authority, that he can do whatever he wants to you whenever he wants, so that you understand he’s boss and will never even consider messing with him. He’s using fear as a motivator to ensure he can…

How did she decide to ignore facts on this one particular topic?

That is a great way to do it. Have a spot where everyone is free to name who they’re voting for and why. Then we can just make assumptions on the people who didn’t disclose. I don’t see a down side.

Wait, a pork knuckle is a real food and not a sex act of some kind?

Holy hell I’m either horrible at typing or autocorrect is a bastard. She should be someone needs to “invent an” not inventory in.

That might be overly harsh on Rose, depending on what really happened. There’s nothing wrong with that situation if everyone was there voluntarily. If that was the case, and the charges were just a money grab, then how they treated her on the stand is completely justified.

Maybe just double down and start each day with an irish coffee enema?

How much experience do you have with IV’s, because I can think of a few good ways to pull this off.

“People have a talent for trivializing racism, especially if it’s the brand that doesn’t affect them. Like they have a serisiously uncanny talent for it.”

Those are not cinnamon rolls and anyone that releases a recipe for them without icing is a bad person and blatantly committing fraud.

If someone offered you a cinnamon roll for breakfast and then followed that up by serving you a roll with no icing you would be pissed. That is because they clearly did not deliver what they claimed they would, as if it does not have icing it is not a cinnamon roll. They are just eating chili with some type of bread,…

I just wish there would have been some Windows 10 auto-update drama, because that would have been awesome.

Batters shouldn’t change what they swing at based on a couple of bad ball strike calls no. If it is consistent then yes absolutely, but not because a a couple of pitches total.

I am getting your point, I’m just disagreeing as to the severity and the impact it has. You say egregious, but what is the actual difference? If the ESPN article people have linked actually showed the numbers I missed them. All the ESPN article appears to show is the difference between what often gets called a…

That’s true, but we’re talking about a couple total pitches that’s true for over two games and in total the Jays have still been the beneficiaries more often than the Indians. So in relation to Joey Bats talking about being intentionally screwed he’s blatantly wrong.

As a browns fan I can tell you that no, Brian Hoyer and Dowell Loggains have in fact never tried this.

Right, but it’s all in an effort to paint a picture that doesn’t exist. We know objectively what should and should not be called a strike. Based on this objective data we know the incorrect calls are roughly equal and the Jays have actually had more go their way.

Like I replied to someone else, that’s trying to factor in how umpires often miss call balls and strikes. Why would we use that analysis when we know what objectively should be called balls and strikes like the article above is using?

That is based on what umpires often call as the strike zone instead of the actual strike zone though right? Per the stats in this article above, the actually number of calls that objectively should or should not be called per the electronically accurate strike zone were roughly even. Trying to factor in what umps…

It is objectively not true. They have the digitally accurate stats in the article showing errors are roughly equal, but actually slightly favor the Jays.