stevieknicks
Stevie Knicks
stevieknicks

Of course not. This is how you build sources, but building trust with them. If you are constantly trying to expose everyone no one will ever tell you anything. You pick and choose your spots of course, but if your career is going to be built on having great sources you better build some friends. It’s not like Woj is

This is a terrifying response. Someone was driving slow in the passing lane, so clearly the only option was to try to kill them? Jesus man, if you actually feel that way when you drive a car do everyone a favor and never drive again.

Honestly, most of the review process is fine as long as your actual look at the reviews and not judge something based on total stars. Just look at a sample of the 3 - 5 star ratings for reviews that actually contain some information, and then look at pretty much all the 1 and 2 star reviews. You can almost always get

Thiel financially backed what wound up a massive monetary win. If anything they should give him an extra board seat.

None of those are easier than telling a lie, and none of those would make you anywhere close to as talked about. All the things someone else has done before don’t garner as much attention as blaming one of the most famous people in the world of domestic abuse.

You can and do ignore whatever you want. It just makes impartial people disregard anything you have to say as uninformed or biased.

While that’s likely true, certainly now how it always works, it definitely doesn’t get anything remotely touching this level of attention for her, which is what her whole career is based around.

There’s an easier way to potentially get half of a 400 million dollar estate and more attention than accusing one of the most famous people on earth of abuse? I’d love to know what that would be.

Probably and possibly are not the same thing. Other than those directly involved, no one knows the truth currently. Pointing out it’s possibly a lie doesn’t make it victim blaming, just like posting pictures with no visible injuries doesn’t make him innocent. People need to stop picking sides in cases where they don’t

So this hasn’t aged well with time then.

I immediately wondered the same once that was worded the way it was. It would be pretty dumb of her to tell Little Finger that first of all people, unless she’s trying to use him somehow.

With how much money they can make through twitter brand advertising it makes sense to be on it for some of them for sure. They make enough money though they need to separate their personal vs business stuff with separate phones. Not really realistic in the case of many college athletes to roll with double phones (plus

Cook is brutal. He has awful accuracy and everyone around him thinks he’s a spoiled douche. He completely fails at two of the most important things to NFL QB’s. There is damn near no way he’s good in the NFL.

Luckily I am not homeless, and I also wanted no part of Johnny in that draft.

As a Browns fan who thought Goff is about 100 times better than Wentz, I couldn’t be happier about this assuming people are right in suspecting they traded up for Wentz.

That’s not a problem when you strap it to a robot dog though.

Yes that’s true, and it’s part of the reason Obama should get respect for the job he’s done as President even if he hasn’t always been great at it. He at least tried to do things he thought were for the best. Meanwhile, Hillary knows it’s the best thing for the country but she isn’t even going to try because it’s not

And I think that number of Americans are only uncomfortable with it because no one mainstream has ever fought for it and explained why it’s the only logical system that makes sense and debunked all the made up horse-shit people have spread about it.

What is that even supposed to mean exactly?

No one should argue Hillary is dumb, because she definitely isn’t. She’s just ridiculously dishonest and power hungry.