Playing without helmets in football would make most of the current head injuries much much safer. Most head injuries in the NFL happen either when someone is using the helmet as a weapon, or just ducking their head and hoping for the best instead of actually keeping their head up and paying attention. Safeties aren’t…

While I understand what the author is saying, it’s not really a reasonable possibility given how the sport works. There are no hard and fast rules that will ever work to stop a fight, because every fight is different and one punch will always have a chance of being all that is necessary to end a fight. It will always…

Even to people who like the MMA that guy sounds like a jackass.

Anyone that pays hundreds of thousands of dollars for a bag deserves to die in a fire.

That is not completely false at all. Players have not been winning lawsuits like this, they have been winning lawsuits when the NFL didn’t follow the CBA. Unless there is some type of information the PA finds showing they didn’t follow the CBA none of those are relevant.

So two things. On your second point, stop trying to compare cases about illegal conduct outside of the sport to NFL rules issues and cheating. They aren’t the same thing in any way, and are in fact controlled by two completely different sections of the CBA.

If the players didn’t agree to it in the CBA than he wouldn’t get to do that. It’s the players own fault they agreed to that stupid system.

If the NFL has singed an agreement saying it would do those things and then refused to you’d have a point.

You are way way way too certain about something you don’t know very much about.

The part you are missing is the whole both sides having agreed in the CBA to how these disagreements are to be handled thing, and how judges tend to not want any part of overruling stuff like that most of the time.

A week? 2 days max. Probably only one.

I mean, the wife I’ll give you. I’m not putting blame on the kids for their Dad being an asshole though. They don’t really have much say in the matter.

Or said a different way, The NFL has a pretty strong circumstantial case based on the ball boys team owned phones, and since Brady decided to destroy his own phone instead of using it to help clear his name they’re pretty damn sure he did it.

Right now no, they don’t really have any legal power to make anyone do anything. They can ask nicely for it, but that’s probably about it. If it goes to court maybe that changes and they can subpoena the records or something.

Only someone that defines “proof” as having video of it happening believes that.

It’s on roughly the same level as a guy who pays ball boys in merch to sneak balls away after officials check them to deflate them a little since he likes them better that way.

It depends how you define “they”. If you mean Verizon, probably not (mostly because they probably don’t want to have that ability so that they can get a subpoena 1,000,000 times a year). If you mean the NSA then probably.

Destroying an old cell phone when you get a new one makes sense. The choice to get a new phone the day before investigators look at your old one however seems a touch fishy.

My extremely religous/modest mother played the pixelated bukkake card and then asked us what it was. My brother and I, who appeared to be the only ones who knew, just went nope. Not gonna tell you that shit.

If you think scallops are foul then you have either never eaten a good scallop or you have the worst taste buds ever encountered in the whole world. If I could eat only scallops I would.