steve87547
Steve
steve87547

10 years sounds reasonable, so, the most anyone could possibly do it would be, what? 9 times? Not that much inconvenience, right? Literally, under 20 hours in an entire lifetime. The issue though...10 years is probably a little long for many people between 70 & 80. And those people that pass their 80 year exam,

Agreed, but the hard stuff, like maneuvering busy parking lots, is the stuff retirees and computers both struggle to get right. 

Literally, at least thirty grand more than I'd ever think about tossing at this thing. Junkyard engine from a fairly high mileage srt8? Plus it's been painted by maaco?! Sign me up...said nobody ever. 

Meh styling and a price tag ($39k with options) that was too much for a Kia in 2009, killed a competent, but not impressive for the cost, SUV.

Your praise for terrible cars that shouldn’t exist, combined with your loathing for anything decent, combined with the history of cars you’ve presumably willingly purchased, makes me think you have not found your dream job.

These terrible afterthought cup holders were my favorite way to spill coffee on my stereo in my 350z.

Oh, I remember my first race camp like it was yesterday....drifting an xj220 around the streets of Paris they closed for us. Really magical. Hard to believe I was only 7. Well, now that I’m 13, it’s hard to believe I'm going to be in charge of the racing division of my uncle's Ferrari dealerships. Life goes so fast,

If it makes you feel any better, I’m equally CP on this LS for $14k if it were super clean and bone stock. Even if it had half the miles, still CP at $14k.

Dude’s got an $80 grand budget, wants fun, luxurious, and comfortable, and he couldn’t come up with amg on his own? And he was test driving Mazdas? Something's not adding up... 

You don’t think this is click-bait? Did it not take a mundane fact you already knew and word it in such a way that you found it interesting or unbelievable? This is the definition of click-bait in my book.

Nobody has ever been taught the planets orbit the sun in a neat row, which is the only thing this study shows does not happen.

Couple of days? This is a 30 second pondering. 

The issue is scientists discovered a hundred+ more “Plutos” in the kuiper belt. It turned into, drop pluto, or add another hundred planets to the solar system. They created new rules for what it meant to be a planet that ruled out all of the kuiper belt objects. The big ones pluto doesn’t pass are orbiting in the same

This is the dumbest “study” I’ve ever read from a “team of scientists”. Seriously, how long did it take them to realize when planets are at the opposite ends of their orbits they’re further apart? This is mind-numingly stupid. To make this any sort of revelation, it means their understanding before their “study”,

She appreciates the ritual and tradition of a sushi dinner? She means getting it from a street stand and eating it on a corner while standing, right? Or does she not really know the "ritual and tradition"? 

A “legitimate restaurant critic” is just a yelper who’s opinion is easier to buy. Not that Yelp, that’s happy to fill its pages with fake reviews and actively hide the real ones, is any more legitimate.

Isn't all this complaining fixable in under 5 minutes with any cheap tuner? 

Didn't it?.... 

Yeah, but people refuse to vote for third party candidates so we're stuck with policies for the 1% from one side or the other. 

As long as you say “world’s fastest, best handling rwd minivan“ I think that’s fair.