I guess if you drive an Accord or Camry, they are ok, but definitely not a performance type car.

All seasons, aka NO seasons. Mediocre at everything. They suck in the summer and suck in the winter.

Fantastic

Because WRX

Fantastic review. Well written and perfectly detailed.

I like this one better:

Sti=2.5, wrx=2.0. Same platform but WAY different engine.

“Hideous wing”? Sorry, but I think you meant to say STI, NOT WRX.

Don’t you think the mustang is heavy enough, adding AWD will just make matters worse.

BRILLIANT! Just when I thought the “Mustang will KILL you” joke was played out, you have restored my faith.

Agreed. The Camaro is fugly. Not to mention the pisspoor visibility, which is a deal breaker for me.

I test drove a 2017 GT and that’s how I felt about the power. It felt weak at lower rpm. Comparing it to the scat pack I had for a bit, it’s especially disappointing. I know you might say that it’s unfair to compare the two (higher revving 5.0 to the insane down low power of the 6.4), but they are direct competition.

I test drove a 2017 GT a few months ago , I was underwhelmed by it. Numbers are overrated.

The sti limited (fully loaded) can be bought/ordered with a wing delete. It still comes with a spoiler, the trunk lip one the wrx has.

I saw minivan with QWERTY. I was immediately jealous for not thinking of that first .

No such thing as better than black (although cranberry does come close). but those T-Types will always have a special place in my heart.... and in fact I like the t-type rims better than the GNs

2001 ford focus with occasional lockup of the brake master cylinder.

My first car was an 84 celeb

Out of the Pony cars, the Camaro would definitely be the best driver in terms of handling to power ratio.

Love those, but slushbox only.... hard pass!